Can the Beppo-Levi relation explain moving sums out of integrals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stukbv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation Sums
AI Thread Summary
The Beppo-Levi theorem allows for the interchange of limits and integrals under certain conditions, specifically when dealing with an increasing sequence of non-negative functions. The discussion clarifies that if the terms being summed are positive or zero, the series can be treated as an increasing sequence, just like the limits in the original theorem. This justifies moving the sum outside of the integral, similar to how limits are handled. The key takeaway is that both the limit and the sum can be interchanged with the integral due to their increasing nature. Understanding this relationship helps clarify the application of the Beppo-Levi theorem in various contexts.
stukbv
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
My lecturer has said that beppo levi means for and increasing sequence of Xi where Xi is simple for all i, it holds that

∫limi → ∞XidP = limi → ∞∫XidP

But why is it that he later says things like

∫ limi→ ∞ Ʃin=1P2(Bw1n)dP1(w1) = limi → ∞Ʃin=1∫P2(Bw1n)dP1(w1)
is a result of beppo levi? Where in beppo levi does it say you can move the sum out of the integral?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi stukbv
The serie (sum) is also a sequence, if the terms you are summing over are positives (or 0) then the sum of the terms is an increasing sequence
therefore the theorem implies that you can take the sum outside of the integral for the same reason that you could take the limit outside before.
That is, your sequence of increasing terms is defined by Ui=Ʃ(up to i)(positive terms)

Cheers...
 
I see, thata makes sense. Thanks for your help
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top