Can the Coefficient of Friction for Air Be Found for Building a Hovercraft?

AI Thread Summary
The coefficient of friction is typically applicable to solid materials in contact, making it difficult to define for air. Instead, resistance in fluids is better described by viscosity, which varies with the fluid's thickness and the object's speed. Air offers significantly less resistance than liquids, influencing how objects like hovercraft operate. Understanding the concept of terminal velocity in relation to air's viscosity may provide useful insights for the project. Consulting fluid dynamics resources could yield valuable information for the hovercraft design.
darnone
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi, I am doing a physics project in which I am building a hovercraft. i want to show mathematically how the craft lowers the friction, however, i cannot find the coefficent of friction for air. i found the coefficient of friction for concret on rubber to be roughly 0.8... any ideas on air? thanks a lot for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
darnone said:
hi, I am doing a physics project in which I am building a hovercraft. i want to show mathematically how the craft lowers the friction, however, i cannot find the coefficent of friction for air. i found the coefficient of friction for concret on rubber to be roughly 0.8... any ideas on air? thanks a lot for any help.

You probably will not find it. Coefficient of friction applies to solid materials in contact with one onother. When fluids are involved, resistance effects are more likely to fall in the realm of viscosity. "Thick" liquids pour slowly, and they resist motion more than thin liquids. Gasses offer far less resistance than liquids. The resistance force on a solid moving through a fluid depends on the speed of motion. The reason a skydiver reaches a terminal velocity is because of the viscosity of air. You might do some searching for information related to that term.
 
Yep, a fluid dynamics textbook would be very handy here. Perhaps you could find some data on google.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top