Can the decay process of Nickel-78 be stopped?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerich1000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stable
jerich1000
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I'm somewhat new here, so forgive me if I ask an inappropriate question (defined as too far out there; this is supposed to be a legitimate site).

How could it be possible to make Nickel-78 stable, and still remain Nickel-78?

Nickel-78 decays via Beta-minus decay, which means one of its neutrons is turned into a W-boson, which in turn decays into an electron and an antineutrino.

Through the process, one down quark is turned into an up quark, which means it's a flavor change, which means the process is a "weak decay", or decay via the weak force.

I've listed the above info to highlight that there are a number of steps invovled in the entire transition. Can any of those steps be halted, thereby halting the decay process?

The quick answer, of course, is no. But if someone were to hire you for an infinite amount of money to stop the process , what change to the process could you make?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jerich1000 said:
I'm somewhat new here, so forgive me if I ask an inappropriate question (defined as too far out there; this is supposed to be a legitimate site).

How could it be possible to make Nickel-78 stable, and still remain Nickel-78?

Nickel-78 decays via Beta-minus decay, which means one of its neutrons is turned into a W-boson, which in turn decays into an electron and an antineutrino.

Through the process, one down quark is turned into an up quark, which means it's a flavor change, which means the process is a "weak decay", or decay via the weak force.

I've listed the above info to highlight that there are a number of steps invovled in the entire transition. Can any of those steps be halted, thereby halting the decay process?

The quick answer, of course, is no. But if someone were to hire you for an infinite amount of money to stop the process , what change to the process could you make?

Thanks

There is no way that I know of to do what you describe, unless money has some magical ability to halt beta-decay.
 
I was expecting the answer, "No, but can I have the money anyway?"
 
jerich1000 said:
I was expecting the answer, "No, but can I have the money anyway?"

That would also be a really good answer. :) All kidding aside, I don't think it's possible. You would be better off using that money to make a constant supply of Nickel-78, right?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
49
Views
12K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top