Can the Energy for Non-Integer Values be Modeled in a Quantum System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eljose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energies Integral
eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Let,s suppose we have a qunatum system so the energies are the roots of the function f(x)=0..then my question is that we could calculate the roots to obtain E(0),E(1),E(2),...but the problem comes when we have the integral..

\int_0^{\infty}E(n)dn my question is if for this case we could modelize E(n) for non-integer n in the form:

E(n)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}E(n)\delta(n-k)

so for this case the sum becomse the series: \sum_{k}E(k) for every positive integer... thanx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We use density matrices all the time w/r/t our pulse sequences in solid-state NMR. They're extremely powerful from a practical pov, b/z the off-diagonal terms represent coherences w/ very useful physical meaning.

A reasonable book w/ some very good practical application is called Spin Dynamics, by Malcolm Levitt. Of course, this is about NMR, but you will quickly see that manipulation of large nxn matrices, after some manipulation of sandwich operators, yields some great results w/o too much headscratching.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top