Can the equation x! + (x-3)! = 16x - 24 be solved for x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alesak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorials
AI Thread Summary
The equation x! + (x-3)! = 16x - 24 is theoretically interesting but does not have integer solutions. For x greater than 2, the left side grows faster than the right side, indicating no equality can be achieved for integer values. Numerical methods reveal four real solutions between 1 and 4.5, specifically x1=1.1837, x2=1.3134, x3=2.1222, and x4=4.4099, along with five negative solutions, none of which are integers. The Gamma function analysis confirms that while there are multiple solutions for negative values, they do not yield exact integers.
Alesak
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
hello everyone,
I usually post my questions on one small czech mathematical forum, but here is an equation no one knows how to "solve". I`ve came to it by accident, when I made an mistake in one combinatorics equation.


x! + (x-3)! = 16x - 24

its fairly simple to solve in one way(x has to be greater than 2, and from some point left side is greater than right side, because (x-3)! is always greater then 0 and we don`t have to care about -24 on the right side, so we can check for which x is x! > 16x. this leaves us only very few possibilities for x to check).

this is nice, but I`d like to know if its possible to get it in form x = something. I can`t think of any way how to do it.

also, this equation doesn`t have any solution, its rather theoretical question.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If x can be a real number (using Gamma function) you can find 4 solutions betweeen 1 and 4.5 (by plotting method or std numeric method).
x1=1.1837
x2=1.3134
x3=2.1222
x4=4.4099
There are also 5 negative solution... None is integer.
 
It is simple to check that there is no integer solution. Factorials increase far more rapidly than a linear function, more rapidly than exponentials even. We know x>2. For x=4, the LHS is smaller than the RHS, for x=5 it is larger, thus there is no integer x where they are equal.
 
I have also tried this in several different ways, I got:

x! = ( 8x (x-2) (x-1) (x-1.5) )/( x (x-1) ( x-2) +1 )

which means no integer values...

Is this really all?
 
Plotting the function (remebering x!=Gamma(x+1))
G(x)=Gamma(x + 1) + Gamma(x - 2) - 16x + 24
you can see that for x>0 there are only four zeros.
For x<0 there are infinite solutions near 0,-1,-2,-3...none exacly integer.
There Gamma function is singular (has a pole) and change sign.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
22K
Back
Top