Can the Gamma Function Simplify Complex Integrals?

Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,728
Definition/Summary

The gamma function denoted by \Gamma (n) is defined by

\Gamma (n) = \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{n-1} e^{-x} dx

is convergent for real and complex argument except for 0, -1, -2, ...-k

Equations

Useful identities:
\Gamma(n+1)=n!

\Gamma (x+1) = x\Gamma(x)

\Gamma \left(\frac12\right) = \sqrt\pi

\Gamma(x) \Gamma(1-x) = \frac{\pi}{\sin(x\pi)}

Extended explanation

The gamma function comes up often in math and physics when dealing with complicated integrals. It has interesting properties, and one of them caught the eye of a Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler. He noted that the integral in question is related to a factorial:

If n is an integer, then

n! = \Gamma (n+1)

But gamma doesn't have to be restricted to only integers, therefore the factorial of real and complex numbers is naturally extended. Another useful property of the gamma is the recurrence formula

\Gamma (x+1) = x\Gamma(x)

which allows one to obtain other values of the integral by knowing its previous values.

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top