Can the Integral of 1/sqrt(1-x^2) be Solved without Using Trig Functions?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sparky_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the integral of \( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}} \) and whether it can be expressed in terms of functions other than trigonometric functions, specifically looking for alternative representations that do not involve arcsine.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the integral evaluates to arcsine(x) and questions if it can be expressed using techniques like integration by parts or substitution without resulting in arcsine.
  • Another participant suggests that while trig substitution can yield the same result, arcsine is likely the only form of the answer.
  • It is noted that all antiderivatives of the integral are unique up to a constant and will ultimately relate back to arcsine.
  • Some participants propose alternative representations of arcsine, such as using power series or complex logarithms, but acknowledge these are still fundamentally related to arcsine.
  • One participant expresses a desire for an expression of arcsine that utilizes logarithmic functions and powers of x, while remaining within the real domain.
  • There is a discussion about the complexity of expressing arcsine in terms of logarithmic functions and the challenges of working in the complex domain.
  • A Taylor series representation of arcsine is mentioned as a potential alternative form.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that arcsine is the primary solution to the integral, but there are multiple competing views on whether it can be expressed in other forms without involving trigonometric functions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of a non-trigonometric expression for the integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations in finding a solution that avoids trigonometric functions while still representing the integral accurately. There is also mention of the complexity involved in working with expressions in the complex domain versus the real domain.

Sparky_
Messages
227
Reaction score
5
Greetings,

I know [tex]\int \frac {1} {{\sqrt{1-x^2}} dx[/tex] is arcsine(x)

My question is can [tex]\int \frac {1} {\sqrt{1-x^2}} dx[/tex]
be solved by some technique (parts, substitution...) and the answer be in terms of x and NOT an expression of arcsine?

Meaning, I would like the solution to the integral in terms of x and possibly other functions (ln for example) but not in terms of trig functions.

If so, can you show me?

Thanks
Sparky_
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It can be done by an appropriate trig substitution ie. x=sin(y), but the answer will end up identically. I'm fairly certain that arcsin(x) is the only answer you will ever get though.
 
Antiderivatives are unique up to a constant. Ie, all antiderivatives of that will be arcsine(x)+C.
 
The only two other (sane) ways I can think of to write that antiderivative is as a power series, or in terms of a complex logarithm. But any of those ways will simply be a different way of writing arcsin x.
 
One could certainly express arcsin in terms of logs using Euler's formula...
 
DeadWolfe said:
One could certainly express arcsin in terms of logs using Euler's formula...

Yea, Hurkyl already mentioned that.

...or in terms of a complex logarithm

So yes I think the OP is happy,

possibly other functions (ln for example)[\QUOTE]
 
What I am wanting is an expression for arcsine that uses other functions (hopefully LN and powers of x) but I am hoping to work in the real domain.

Gib Z help me quite a bit with a derivation regarding arcsine.

I was hoping some clever integration could come up with another expression equal to arcsin by integrating the derivative of arcsine.

Any thoughts?

Thanks
Sparky_
 
If trig substitution, which just about everyone mentioned, is not a "clever integration", I don't know what is!
 
I agree trig substitution is clever, I was hoping for a solution that doesn't include trig functions.

-Sparky_
 
  • #10
I remember what sparky wanted from his previous thread that i tried to help him in. He had [tex]\arcsin x = -i \ln ( ix \pm \sqrt{1-x^2})[/tex] as he should, but could not prove why the expressions were equal.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Correct Gib_Z and you did help me prove it - you helped me get the true solution and in that I ended up with some other solutions that I assumed involved the other quadrants.

Using that expression (arcsin = -iln(...) has become very involved due to working in the complex domain.

I'm now searching for a similar type of solution in the real domain only. (I suppose this rules out Euler's)

-Sparky_
 
  • #12
Well then the best answer I can give you is the Taylor Series for Arcsin x, which If i remember correctly is this:

[tex]\arcsin x = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{(2n)!}{4^n (n!)^2 (2n+1)} x^{2n+1}[/tex]
 
  • #13
Thank you all for your help.

Sparky_
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K