Can the Photoelectric Effect Distinguish Between Classical and Quantum Theories?

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



In the photoelectric experiments the photocurrent is proportional to the intensity of the light.Can this result alone be used to distinguish between the classical and quantum theories?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



As I know, this feature of photoelectric effect is the only feture that is compatible with classical concepts.So,this cannot be used like that...

[Classical Idea: As you increase the intensity of the light,you are treating the free surface electrons with Electric field and magnetic field of bigger amplitude---Force on them is bigger and they can speed up more promptly giving a bigger value of photoelectric current.]

Please check the classical idea.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[Classical Idea: As you increase the intensity of the light,you are treating the free surface electrons with Electric field and magnetic field of bigger amplitude---Force on them is bigger and they can speed up more promptly giving a bigger value of photoelectric current.]

(I am editing my response, as I misread the question the first time.)

It is true that the photocurrent would increase with intensity in the classical theory. A greater intensity was supposed to decrease the time lag before the electron was released, thereby allowing more electrons to be set free in a given span of time and increasing the current. This seems to be roughly what your explanation says, though I wouldn't word it quite that way.

I'm not sure about intensity being exactly proportional to photocurrent in the classical theory, though. I suppose this depends on the mode of absorbing the energy. If the absorbtion rate was proportional to energy, then it would be proportional (since intensity is proportional to energy.)
 
Last edited:
Neelakash: Check your classical explanation. An EM wave is made up of an alternating E-field. Why should a larger amplitude in an alternating E-field produce a larger dc current?
 
Last edited:
Gokul43201 said:
This is extremely misleading.

Yes, I have edited my response. I hope I did not mislead anyone too badly. :frown:

Neelakash: Check your classical explanation. An EM wave is made up of an alternating E-field. Why should a larger amplitude in an alternating E-field produce a larger dc current?

The electron was supposed to have a way of gradually absorbing the energy, until at some point the accumulated energy was enough to free it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top