Can the Planck Function Determine Single Photon Emitted Flux?

AI Thread Summary
The Planck Function provides the radiated power per unit area for a black body when integrated over all wavelengths. It can be used to find emitted flux for a single photon energy by utilizing the function in its unintegrated form, given a known temperature or kT value. However, the spectral energy density and spectral emissive power formulas approximate quantized distributions to smooth distributions, leading to zero emitted energy at any specific wavelength or frequency. This is analogous to the probability of finding a pebble with an exact mass being zero. Care must be taken when defining these distributions in terms of frequency, as the formulas differ and are prone to errors.
Rod Brown
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
For my own edification.

The Planck Function when integrated over all wavelengths will give the radiated power per unit area for a black body. Would I be right in thinking, that if I had a known temperature for the black body source or indeed a kT value for that source that by using the function unintegrated, an emitted flux can be found for a single photon energy (frequency) being emitted by that source rather than a range? does Bv = emitted flux in the usual sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The formulae for spectral energy density and spectral emissive power (per unit area) 'approximate' the quantised distributions to smooth distributions. I've put 'approximate' in quotes, because the approximation is, to all intents and purposes, undetectable.

So when you use these distributions, the energy density or emitted energy per unit area is zero at any particular wavelength (or frequency), just in the same way as the probability of finding on a beach a pebble of mass 1.0000000000000000000000000000... gram (or 1.08172305825769346720638560... gram) is zero.

That's why the formulae are often written as u\lambda d\lambda = [stuff]d\lambda and E\lambda d\lambda = [similar stuff]d\lambda, including d\lambda on each side.

Note that you can also define spectral energy density and spectral emissive power as distributions in terms of frequency. The formulae are somewhat different, and it is easy to make mistakes.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top