Can the Roots of Polynomials Be Proven?

Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
It is basic knowledge that if a polynomial P(x) of nth degree has a root or zero at P(a), then (x-a) is a factor of the polynomial. However, can this be proved? or is this more of a definition of roots of polynomials?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
there are polynomials Q(x),R(x) ,such that degR(x)<deg(x-a) and P(x)=(x-a)Q(x)+R(x),if
P(a)=0,we have R(a)=0,for degR(x)<deg(x-a),R(x) is constant
 
If p(a) = 0, use the division algorithm to write p(x) = q(x)(x - a) + r(x), where either deg r(x) < deg (x - a) = 1, or r(x) = 0; in either case r(x) = b is a constant polynomial, so p(x) = q(x)(x - a) + b, so 0 = p(a) = q(a)(a - a) + b = b, which means p(x) = q(x)(x - a). Thus, x - a divides p(x).
 
This can be proved. Let us say P(x) has a root at a if P(a)=0. Let us say (x-a) is a factor of the polynomial P(x) is there exist a polynomial Q(x) of degree one less such that P(x)=(x-a)Q(x).

Theorem Factor Theorem

Let P(x) be a polynomial of the nth degree and let P(a)=0, then (x-a) is a factor of P(x).
Proof
This proof will follow from the remainder theorem.

Theorem Remainder Theorem
Let P(x) be a polynomial of the nth degree , then P(x)=(x-a)Q(x)+R where Q(x) is a polynomial of degee one less and R is a constant.
Proof
let (x-a)^k be writtten in exppanded form for k=1,...,n
(x-a)^0=1
(x-a)^1=x-a
(x-a)^2=x^2-2ax+a^2
(x-a)^3=x^3-3ax^2+3a^2x-a^3
and so on
Since Q(x) polynommial we may write it in the form
Q(x)=a+bx+cx^2+dx^3+...
we can select the coefficients as follows
Express P(x) in standard form choose the coefficient of x^n in P(x) for the x^(n-1) term of Q(x).
Express [P(x)-(coeffcicent chosen in previous step)x^n] in standard form choose the coefficient of x^(n-1) for the x^(n-2) term of Q(x).
Express [P(x)-(coeffcicent chosen two steps back)x^n-(coeffcicent chosen one step back)x^(n-2)] in standard form choose the coefficient of x^(n-2) for the x^(n-3) term of Q(x).
Continue in this patern to find all coefficients of Q(x).
chose
R=P(0)+aQ(0)
QED

Proof Theorem Factor Theorem (continued)
Write P(x) as in the remainder theorem

P(x)=(x-a)Q(x)+R

The factor theorem will be proved if we show R=0.
set x=a
P(x)=(x-a)Q(x)+R
P(a)=(a-a)Q(x)+R
P(a)=(0)Q(x)+R
P(a)=R

Since a is a root of P(x),
P(a)=0 hence R=0.

QED
 
Ahh I see We simply need to express the polynomial in the form P(x)=A(x)Q(x)+R(x) and it all falls into place :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top