Can the Same Equation for Moment of Inertia Apply to Non-Uniform Cylinders?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rclakmal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Moment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the moment of inertia equation for non-uniform cylinders in the context of calculating metacentric height. It clarifies that while the second moment of area and moment of inertia are related, they differ primarily in that the moment of inertia accounts for density. The equation for moment of inertia can still be applied to non-uniform cylinders, but adjustments may be necessary to account for varying density. Additionally, the second moment of area remains independent of the uniformity of the body. Overall, understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate calculations in fluid mechanics and structural engineering.
rclakmal
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
second moment of area ?

Homework Statement



In finding the metacentric height of a floating body ( G-center of gravity ,M-metacentric point ,B-buoyancy point )
so if the object is stable then M should be above G .
GM=BM-BG

i have learned that BM=I/V (where I second moment of are about the horizontal center line ,and V is submerged volume)
so if the object is a cylinder i can find I using Pi*d^(4)/64 ...but can i use the same equation if the cylinder is not a uniform one .


And is it the same thing meant by
1)second moment of area
2)Moment of inertia
Or are they two different values ?
Can they be connected using a another varaible ?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org


i have learned that BM=I/V (where I second moment of are about the horizontal center line ,and V is submerged volume)
so if the object is a cylinder i can find I using Pi*d^(4)/64 ...but can i use the same equation if the cylinder is not a uniform one .

The second moment of area is similar to the moment of inertia except for one extremely important point:

The moment of inertia includes an integral over density, \rho.
I_{inertia} = \int \rho r^2 dA.

The second moment of area does not.
I_{area} = \int r^2 dA.

Hence, for a uniform object, I_{inertia} = \rho I_{area}.

Therefore, the second moment of area is independent of the uniformity of the body.
 
moment of inertia ~ second moment of area

Hi Hao! :smile:

You're right, and you're wrong! :biggrin:

For all normal physicists, you're right …

but some structural engineers use the name https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=31" for the second moment of area, so they can be the same (and in this case I suspect they are)! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top