I Can the spin states of a spin1 particle be modeled?

edguy99
Gold Member
Messages
449
Reaction score
28
There is a video from the Space Station here:

At around the 1 minute mark, you see the stability of the CD player when the CD inside is spinning. Don Pettit goes on to tape additional CD players together at 90 degrees to the original to make it stable in 2 directions, but my questions is are a little different.

1. He occasional gives a small tap to the spinning CD player causing it to wobble a bit. If he hit it a little harder, would it flip?

2. If he taped 2 CD players together, one on top of the other rather then at 90 degrees, he has 3 ways of doing it. He can have both CD's spinning to the right, both CD's spinning to the left, or 1 CD spinning right and 1 CD spinning left. In the case of 1 CD spinning right and 1 CD spinning left, would this act as the spin0 state of a spin1 particle and required no energy to "flip"? Ie. the 2 CD's taped together would not act like a gyroscope but more like a CD that is not even turning?

This question would be very easy to answer with access to the space station, but unfortunately I have no access and not enough money to buy a trip up there although I would love to go with some CD players and a bit of duct tape to try it myself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This question doesn't seem to have anything to do with Quantum Physics or spin-1 particles. It looks like a straightforward classical physics question. Should this thread be moved to the Classical Physics forum?
 
PeterDonis said:
Should this thread be moved to the Classical Physics forum?
It depends on whether the question here is about the behavior of spinning CD players or whether the spinning CD players are a good analogy for quantum mechanical addition of angular momentum. If the former, it should be moved; if the latter, the answer is "no".

I expect that @edguy99 will be able to clarify.
 
Last edited:
Nugatory said:
It depends on whether the question here is about the behavior of spinning CD players or whether the spinning CD players are a good analogy for quantum mechanical addition of angular momentum. If the former, it should be moved; if the latter, the answer is "no".

I expect that @edguy will be able to clarify.
Definitely the later. "whether the spinning CD players are a good analogy for quantum mechanical addition of angular momentum" is the question. I tried to narrow the scope by specifically talking about 3 states of a spin1 particle. I feel it does model it correctly, but I am not sure there will be general agreement on this, hence the question and hopefully some debate.

Depending on the reaction to this concept (ie. if allowed), I would like to expand the spin0 state analogy and cut the tape on the spin0 state and watch what happens as the CD's drift apart. I would expect them to continue spinning in opposite directions, one up and one down state, but I would also not be surprised to see some "precession" or "wobble" in the 2 CD players again preserving all conserved quantities where both CD's would precess in opposite ways, but if visualized back together, the precession would cancel out (conservation of spin and angular momentum).

*edited spelling and grammer
 
Last edited:
edguy99 said:
"whether the spinning CD players are a good analogy for quantum mechanical addition of angular momentum" is the question.

Then the answer Nugatory gave is correct: no, it isn't.

Thread closed.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top