Can the Universe Expand While Matter Converges Under Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether the universe can expand while matter within it converges due to gravity. It raises the question of whether the expansion of the universe is independent of the behavior of matter. Local clumping of matter, such as the Great Attractor, is acknowledged, but it's noted that such clumping affects only a small fraction of galaxies. The majority of observable galaxies are receding at speeds greater than the speed of light, complicating the dynamics of local convergence. Overall, while local clumping is possible, it is unlikely to significantly counteract the universe's overall expansion.
Glenn
Hi,
I have read a bit about open, closed, and flat universes, Hubbles Constant, the accellerating universe, big bag, big cruch, etc...

Is it possible that the expansion rate (+ or -) of the universe might be independant of the expansion rate (+ or -) of the matter within it?

Is it possible that the universe might continute to expand while the matter within it might start to converge under the force of gravity?

Have these options been explored?

-Glenn
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Before anyone could explore it you would have to define how you distinguish between "the expansion of the universe" and "the expansion of the matter in it".
 
Originally posted by Glenn


Is it possible that the universe might continute to expand while the matter within it might start to converge under the force of gravity?

local clumping is always a possibility

(you know about the Great Attractor in the hydra-centaurus direction, towards which the virgo cluster and its hangers-on are falling-----the speeds involved are on the ordr of 300 km/s or a THOUSANDTH of c)

however it is not hard to see that any particular local clumping can never involve more than a tiny fraction of the galaxies in the observable universe--just by a practical comparison of speeds

first of all, the great bulk of the observable is at redshift greater than 2----to take a random cutoff for calculation purposes (you probably know that a quasar has been observed with redshift 6.4 and the CMB has redshift 1100, so in the big picture 2 is a small redshift)

anything with cosmological redshift of 2 or more is in a part of space which is receding from us at a speed greater than c

(for an online calculator that gives the recessionspeeds for various redshifts, google "Siobahn Morgan" and find her astronomy course materials, the current Fall 2003 semester)

maybe largescale clumping is not a theoretical impossibility but the usual falling speeds (a thousandth) are just too tiny to
counteract the typical recession speeds (several times c)
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top