A Can the Unwrapped Phase Function of a Fourier Transform be Derived?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Phase
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the unwrapped phase function of a Fourier Transform, starting from its polar form representation. The process involves taking the natural logarithm of the Fourier Transform and differentiating it with respect to ω. The key point of confusion arises when trying to equate the derivatives of the logarithmic expressions to find the derivative of the phase function θ(ω). The final equation presented relates the derivative of θ(ω) to the real and imaginary parts of the Fourier Transform's derivative. Ultimately, the original poster successfully solved the problem and indicated that the discussion could be deleted.
Cyrus
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
17
I am stuck trying to derive the unwrapped phase function of a Fourier Transform. Here is the gist of the derivation.

We can express the Fourier Transform in polar form: X(e ) = |X(e)| e

We can take the ln of both sides, resulting in:

ln X(ejω) = ln | X(ejω) | + j θ(ω)

Taking the derivative w.r.t. ω:

d ln X(ejω) / dω = d | X(ejω)| / dω + j dθ/dω

But, if we express X(ejω) = Xre(ejω) + j Xim(ejω) then we can also find the derivative to be:

d ln X(ejω) / dω = 1/ X(ejω) [ d X(ejω)/dω] = 1/ X(ejω) [dXre(ejω)/dω + jdXim(ejω)/dω]

Here is where I cannot get to: The author then states: " Therefore, the derivative of θ(ω) with respect to ω is given by the imaginary part of the right hand side of the second equation I wrote from the top. Somehow he is finding the equation below when equating/combining the two definitions of the derivatives of the ln X(ejw),"

dθ/dω = 1/ | X(ejω)|2 [ Xre(ejω) d Xim (ejω) / dω - Xim(ejω)dXre(ejω)/dω]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I was able to solve the problem, feel free to delete.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
490
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top