Can These Two Complex Math Equations Be Solved Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RaYaMe
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving two complex math equations in preparation for an upcoming exam. The first equation involves finding constants a and b in the relationship q=ap^b using given logarithmic values. The user attempts to derive values for a and b by taking the natural logarithm of both sides and manipulating the equations, ultimately calculating b as -0.25 and a as e^2.06. The second equation requires combining logarithms, which the user approaches by expressing logb(x) + n as a single logarithm. The responses confirm the user's methods and calculations as correct.
RaYaMe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0


Hi every body , I had a lot of equations to solve yesterday

becouse that i was preparing my self for my exam this sunday

and I've did .. but these TWO equations .. i couldn't be sure about my results

can you help me to solve them ..

1- The variables p and q are related by the law q=ap^b , where a and b are constants . Given that ln(p) = 1.32 when ln(q)= 1.73 and ln(p)=0.44 when ln(q)=1.95 ,
find the values of a and b .

2- Write logb (x) + n as one logarithm


* b is the base

 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi RaYaMe! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Show us what you got, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
for the second one ..
2- Write logb (x) + n as one logarithm

i've tried =>

logb (x) + logb (b)^n = logb (X.b^n) ?? or it's canceled

:biggrin:

AND ..the first one .. i tried to take ln of both sides ( q=ap^b)

lnq = lna + b lnp

It'll be >> 1- 1.73= lna + 1.32 b

>> 2- 1.95 = lna + 0.44 b

that's what I've did to get the value of " b "

1.73=lna + 1.32 b
-1.95 = -lna - 0.44 b
___________________
-0.22 = 0.88 b >>>>> b= -0.22/0.88 = -0.25

1.73 = lna + ( 1.32 * -0.25 )
1.73 + 0.33 = lna
2.06 = lna

so , a = e^2.06 :biggrin: what do you think about my ways ..
 
Last edited:
RaYaMe said:
logb (x) + logb (b)^n = logb (X.b^n)

-0.22 = 0.88 b >>>>> b= -0.22/0.88 = -0.25

1.73 = lna + ( 1.32 * -0.25 )
1.73 + 0.33 = lna
2.06 = lna

so , a = e^2.06 :biggrin: what do you think about my ways ..

Yes, that looks fine! :smile:
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top