Can This Summation Formula Generate the Fibonacci Sequence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vince00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the summation formula \sum a, m=0, (a-m)! / m!(a-2m)! generates the Fibonacci sequence. The user attempts to show that Xm+2 = Xm+1 + Xm using induction, starting with base cases X0 and X1. However, they express frustration over getting stuck in their calculations and suspect mistakes in their approach. Another participant suggests using proper LaTeX formatting for clarity and questions the definition of Xm. The conversation highlights the challenges of mathematical proof and notation in discussing the Fibonacci sequence.
Vince00

Homework Statement


Proof that \sum a, m=0, (a-m)! / m!(a-2m)! = the fibonacci sequence.

Homework Equations


Fibonacci: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, ... (but I think everyone knows that one!)

The Attempt at a Solution


Let Xm = \suma m=0 (a-m)! / m!(a-2m)!
I think I better proof Xm+2 = Xm+1 + Xm (follows from the fibonacci), so I can conclude that Xm = Fm+1.
I think using induction is the best way to go: Prooving it for X0 and X1, maybe even X2.
My attempt:
\sum a+2, m=0, (a+2-m)! / m!(a+2-2m)! = \sum a+1, m=0, (a+1-m)! / m!(a+1-2m)! + \sum a, m=0, (a-m)! / m!(a-2m)!
=\sum a+1, m=0, (a+1-m)! / m!(a+1-2m)! + \sum a+1, m=1, (a-m-1)! / (m-1)!(a-m-1-m+1)! ... but I think I am making big mistakes here, because whatever I do, I get stuck.
I just don't see it!

Vince, freshmen physics, sorry but I don't know how to use the symbols and stuff!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's difficult to read what you have written. Try editing it by using the proper LaTeX. Just click on my output below to see the way to do it.
\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n for sums and subscripts
\frac{(a-m)!}{m!(a-2m)!} for fractions
Also, what is Xm?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top