Can UV photons spontaneously convert into IR photons, and vice versa?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of high energy photons converting into lower energy photons and vice versa, exploring both theoretical and experimental aspects. Participants examine the conditions under which such processes might occur, referencing specific physical laws and phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether high energy photons can spontaneously convert into multiple lower energy photons and if the reverse process is possible, noting that redshift occurs during the photon’s journey through space.
  • Another participant suggests that there is no law of physics that describes the spontaneous conversion of photons in the manner proposed.
  • A different viewpoint mentions Spontaneous Down Conversion and Up Conversion, indicating that these processes require special conditions, such as the presence of a crystal.
  • One participant proposes that a Feynman diagram could illustrate the absorption of a UV photon and the emission of IR photons, although they acknowledge this may be improbable.
  • Another participant explains that in an external electromagnetic field, a single photon can split into lower energy photons, but this is impossible without such a field due to kinematic constraints.
  • Several participants discuss the classical and quantum mechanical interpretations of photon interactions, including references to the Euler–Heisenberg Lagrangian and photon-photon scattering.
  • One participant cites Furry's Theorem, explaining that it prevents a single photon from downshifting to two photons due to spin-statistics considerations, while noting that matter can introduce non-linear effects that may alter these arguments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the possibility of photon conversion processes, with no consensus reached. Some agree on the constraints imposed by physical laws, while others propose theoretical frameworks that suggest potential mechanisms under specific conditions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions about external fields and the kinematic arguments that govern photon interactions. The complexity of the interactions and the role of quantum mechanics versus classical interpretations are also noted.

edevere
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My general question is: can high energy photons convert into many lower energy photons? Could the reverse reaction occur spontaneously?
Let's say we have a single photon that was emitted from a distant supernova. We detect it here on Earth. The photon hasn't converted into multiple lower energy photons during the path from the supernova to the Earth. It just gets red-shifted as space expands.

So, to start we have: Energy = 12 eV, Spin = 1, Momentum = 12 eV/c, Charge = 0

If the photon could split into 3 lower energy photons of Spin (+1,-1,+1) all in the same direction, we would have:

Energy = 4+4+4=12 eV, Spin = 1-1+1=1, Momentum = 4+4+4=12 eV/c, Charge = 0+0+0=0

Since bosons are allowed to be in the same energy state, we could have all 3 new photons be exactly the same energy. Though, the energy values could have be any number of different combinations.

What law of physics prevents this splitting from happening? And vice versa, what prevents the 3 photons from converting into 1 higher energy photon?
Thanks,
Eddie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no law of physics to describe what you are looking for (either way).
 
edevere said:
My general question is: can high energy photons convert into many lower energy photons? Could the reverse reaction occur spontaneously?

On their own, I don't believe so. (Or the likelihood is too small to be of any consideration.)

There is a process called Spontaneous Down Conversion (and its reverse Up Conversion) in which 1 photon becomes 2 and vice versa. However, a special crystal is required to make that happen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_parametric_down-conversion
 
I think this should be possible. You can write down a Feynman diagram with an electron loop with four vertices.
On one vertex, the uv photon is absorbed, on the other three, an ir photon is being emitted.
Probably only very improbable.

Ah, see here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delbruck_scattering
 
edevere said:
What law of physics prevents this splitting from happening? And vice versa, what prevents the 3 photons from converting into 1 higher energy photon?
Thanks,
Eddie

In an external electromagnetic field, it is possible to for a single photon to split into two or more lower energy photons. The process is related to the "scattering of light by light" diagram in DrDu's link. In the absence of an external field, the splitting of a single photon into other photons is impossible by a kinematical argument, discussed in this thread. The details of the kinematic argument are summarized in this post. I didn't discuss the collinearity constraint in detail there. That is the point that, since the initial photon has no center of mass frame, all of the photons in the process must have their momenta on the same line.
 
Very interesting. It should be possible to describe this in terms of a classical picture drawing cute little rotating arrows, don't you think so?
 
DrDu said:
Very interesting. It should be possible to describe this in terms of a classical picture drawing cute little rotating arrows, don't you think so?

This would be a one-loop effect, so I don't think there's a purely classical version of the argument. It is true that the Euler–Heisenberg Lagrangian vanishes for a sum of collinear EM waves, since ##\mathbf{E}\cdot \mathbf{B} = \mathbf{E}^2 - \mathbf{B}^2 =0##.
 
fzero said:
This would be a one-loop effect, so I don't think there's a purely classical version of the argument.
There's a classical limit in which photon-photon scattering is described by adding quartic terms to the usual Lagrangian, such as FαβFβγFγδFδα.
 
  • #11
Bill_K said:
Delbruck scattering is something slightly different - photon scattering in a Coulomb field.

Of course, but the relevant Feynman diagram is drawn in the article.
 
  • #12
A single photon cannot downshift to 2 because of something called Furry's Theorem. proved by Wendell Furry. This generalizes to any even number of photons.

If you have an odd number of photons, you will discover that spin-statistics sets all the amplitudes to zero: you end up with terms like the momentum of one photon dotted into the difference of the other two, which spin-statistics will force to be zero.

In matter, the premises of these arguments are no longer strictly true, and non-linear effects can produce them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
873
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K