Can we calculate the exact number of receptors on E.Coli membrane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eagle9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Membrane
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the uncertainty regarding the exact number and types of receptors on the E. coli cell membrane. While general knowledge exists about the types of proteins in the membrane, such as carrier proteins and ion channels, precise counts remain elusive. A referenced study by Taniguchi et al. (2010) measured protein copy numbers but did not provide specific receptor counts. Participants express skepticism about the feasibility of counting receptors due to the dynamic nature of protein expression and degradation in response to environmental changes. The use of scanning probe and electron microscopy is debated, with limitations noted in distinguishing between different outer membrane proteins. A bionumbers database suggests there are approximately 200,000 proteins in the inner membrane and 300,000 in the outer membrane of E. coli, providing a potential avenue for further exploration.
Eagle9
Messages
238
Reaction score
10
I have heard that nobody really knows how many receptors are placed on E.Coli cell membrane. Of course we know the general types of the proteins incorporated in membrane (Carrier proteins, Na+/K+-ATPase, various transporters, Ion channels) but I need to know the exact number of types and exact total number of receptors on E.Coli membrane. Actually there is a article in Wikipedia but it does not give us this number. :rolleyes:

So, what can you tell me about this? Has anybody counted them? If there is a better web-forum for microbiology then tell me and I will post this question there :smile:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The following paper has measured the copy number of nearly every protein in E. coli:

Taniguchi et al. 2010 Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells. Science 329: 533. doi:10.1126/science.1188308.
 
Eagle9 said:
<snip> I need to know the exact number of types and exact total number of receptors on E.Coli membrane. <snip>

Why do you think this number would remain constant for any meaningful length of time? Proteins degrade and are replaced. Expression levels vary in response to environmental cues. Cells are not time-independent objects.
 
Please tell me why we cannot simply count the number of receptors? Cannot the Scanning probe microscope or the Scanning electron microscope scan the plasmatic membrane and see any roughness on it? Such roughness would be the receptors.

Ygggdrasil
The following paper has measured the copy number of nearly every protein in E. coli:
I quickly reviewed it twice but there are no exact and direct data of how many receptors are placed on the membrane. They say:
The fluorescence images show the intracellular localization of protein (Fig. 1, C to E).Most
cytoplasmic proteins were uniformly distributed intracellularly (Fig. 1C), whereas manymembranebound or periplasmic proteins showed localization
along the outer contours of the cell (Fig. 1D and table S3). Other proteins, including some
DNA-bound proteins and low-copy membrane proteins, showed punctate localization (Fig. 1E).
but this is not what I actually want.

Did I miss something there? :rolleyes:

Andy Resnick
Why do you think this number would remain constant for any meaningful length of time? Proteins degrade and are replaced. Expression levels vary in response to environmental cues. Cells are not time-independent objects.
No, I do not think this, but still I want to know the number (at least variable number and not constant) of receptors on the membrane.
 
Eagle9 said:
Please tell me why we cannot simply count the number of receptors? Cannot the Scanning probe microscope or the Scanning electron microscope scan the plasmatic membrane and see any roughness on it? Such roughness would be the receptors.

E. coli are gram negative bacteria, meaning they have an inner membrane and an outer membrane. Scanning probe microscopes (if they have the ability to detect these proteins) would be able to count only the outer membrane proteins. Furthermore, they would not be able to distinguish between the different types of outer membrane proteins.

I quickly reviewed it twice but there are no exact and direct data of how many receptors are placed on the membrane. They say:

but this is not what I actually want.

Did I miss something there? :rolleyes:

The information in table S6 should allow you to calculate the mean number of each protein in the E. coli strains they measured. All you need to do is compare that data to a list of E. coli membrane proteins.The bionumbers database, says the there are ~200000 proteins in the inner membrane of E. coli and ~300000 proteins in the outer membrane: http://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu//bionumber.aspx?id=100083&ver=3
 
Ygggdrasil
E. coli are gram negative bacteria, meaning they have an inner membrane and an outer membrane. Scanning probe microscopes (if they have the ability to detect these proteins) would be able to count only the outer membrane proteins. Furthermore, they would not be able to distinguish between the different types of outer membrane proteins.
Ok, let such microscope do it, is it possible? It will simply move along the outer membrane and it will ”feel” something on the membrane, this “something” will be receptor. Has anybody tried to do it?
The information in table S6 should allow you to calculate the mean number of each protein in the E. coli strains they measured. All you need to do is compare that data to a list of E. coli membrane proteins.
Where is possible to find them? :rolleyes:
The bionumbers database, says the there are ~200000 proteins in the inner membrane of E. coli and ~300000 proteins in the outer membrane: http://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu//b...d=100083&ver=3
Thanks, this latter information is valuable; I think I can trust this web-site :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
I use ethanol for cleaning glassware and resin 3D prints. The glassware is sometimes used for food. If possible, I'd prefer to only keep one grade of ethanol on hand. I've made sugar mash, but that is hardly the least expensive feedstock for ethanol. I had given some thought to using wheat flour, and for this I would need a source for amylase enzyme (relevant data, but not the core question). I am now considering animal feed that I have access to for 20 cents per pound. This is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top