B Can we entangle particles to make wormholes our own size?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter QuasBlackWorm MIT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Wormholes
QuasBlackWorm MIT
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to find a particle large enough when entangled can create a wormhole for humans?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Entanglement has nothing to do with hypothetical wormholes.
Elementary particles don't have a size, and the size of composite particles has nothing to do with either entanglement or wormholes.
 
The OP may be referring to some of the video lectures made by Leonard Susskind in which he talks about forming ER bridges between black holes. I'm not sure if this counts as a peer reviewed source or not but I believe this may be what he is referring to.

Cheers
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top