Can We Generate Energy by Drilling Deep Ocean Holes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Erazman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Gravity
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical concept of generating energy by drilling deep ocean holes to harness geothermal heat. It proposes using a generator at the bottom of a deep hole, where high temperatures would evaporate water, allowing steam to rise and drive turbines. While the idea presents significant potential energy output, estimated at around 40 gigawatts per ton of water per second, practical challenges include the technical difficulties of deep-sea drilling and maintaining system efficiency. Concerns about environmental impact and the feasibility of such a project are also raised, suggesting that simpler geothermal methods on land may be more viable. Overall, while innovative, the concept faces substantial engineering and ecological hurdles.
  • #61
MiguelQ said:
look water is magnetized like matter is.. just check those videos on youtube with high power magnets and you will se water foating like zero-G
Water's relative permeability, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permeability_(electromagnetism)#Values_for_some_common_materials", is only μ/μ0=0.999992

If you're going to make fantastic claims, at least post a link to "those videos" so we have something to critique.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #62
Erazman said:
Theres already methods of harnessing energy from gravity (like from the flow of water), but not in very massive amounts.

The highest capacity power plant in the world is the Three Gorges complex currently above 20,000 MW of hydroelectric power.

The water mass of the complex is so great that it has bent the Earth's crust.
 
  • #63
thats from its mass, not its magnetism

dr
 
  • #64
Redbelly98 said:
Water's relative permeability, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permeability_(electromagnetism)#Values_for_some_common_materials", is only μ/μ0=0.999992

If you're going to make fantastic claims, at least post a link to "those videos" so we have something to critique.

He's going to link the levetating frog. Not realising that it's BECAUSE water has a low permeability (ie it's a diamagnet) that it levetates which isn't the same as magnetising it. It also required enormous field strengths.On a different note, I believe I misread what andrewbb was talking about (just reread the thread). The talk of capillary action made me thing he was trying to increase that effect by magnetism :redface:. Not that just a charged rod would encourage condenstation. Which I've never head of, but don't know enough about to comment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K