Can we get Higher Frequencies from an Oven Magnetron?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequencies oven
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of modifying a typical oven magnetron to produce higher frequencies of electromagnetic radiation. Participants explore theoretical modifications, implications for cooking, and the technical constraints of magnetron design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether it is possible to modify a magnetron to achieve higher frequencies, suggesting that they are designed to oscillate at a specific frequency.
  • One participant proposes that changing the frequency could allow for resonance with components of food other than water.
  • Another participant suggests that decreasing Brownian motion by freezing food with liquid nitrogen could increase photon energy, although they express skepticism about its applicability to magnetrons.
  • Technical details are provided regarding the frequency selection for microwave ovens, including regulatory constraints and the cost of power generation at different frequencies.
  • Concerns are raised about the physical limitations of magnetrons, including the relationship between cavity dimensions and frequency, and the effects of heating on frequency stability.
  • Some participants assert that a microwave oven does not operate at the resonant frequency of water, indicating that any frequency could theoretically be used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of modifying magnetrons for higher frequencies, with some asserting it is not possible while others propose potential modifications. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the physical design of magnetrons, regulatory constraints on frequency, and the implications of modifications on performance and safety.

tade
Messages
720
Reaction score
26
magnetron.gif

Is it possible, and if so, how should we modify a typical oven magnetron so as to produce higher frequencies of EM radiation?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
tade said:
magnetron.gif

Is it possible, and if so, how should we modify a typical oven magnetron so as to produce higher frequencies of EM radiation?

no, they are designed to oscillate at a specific frequency

and what dangerous things were you planning to do with 100's of Watts of microwave power ?Dave
 
davenn said:
no, they are designed to oscillate at a specific frequency
I know, but with modifications?

davenn said:
and what dangerous things were you planning to do with 100's of Watts of microwave power ?
change the frequency so as to resonate with the other components of food, besides the water in food.
 
I guess you could decrease the Brownian motion by freezing it with liquid nitrogen and thus increase the photon energy aka frequency. It works with lasers and leds, I doubt it will with a magnetron, though.
 
tade said:
… change the frequency so as to resonate with the other components of food, besides the water in food.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven#Principles
Wikipedia said:
Sometimes, microwave heating is explained as a resonance of water molecules, but this is incorrect; such resonances occur only at above 1 terahertz (THz).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven#Design
Wikipedia said:
The microwave frequencies used in microwave ovens are chosen based on regulatory and cost constraints. The first is that they should be in one of the industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) frequency bands set aside for non-communication purposes. For household purposes, 2.45 GHz has the advantage over 915 MHz in that 915 MHz is only an ISM band in the ITU Region 2 while 2.45 GHz is available worldwide. Three additional ISM bands exist in the microwave frequencies, but are not used for microwave cooking. Two of them are centered on 5.8 GHz and 24.125 GHz, but are not used for microwave cooking because of the very high cost of power generation at these frequencies. The third, centered on 433.92 MHz, is a narrow band that would require expensive equipment to generate sufficient power without creating interference outside the band, and is only available in some countries.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
tade said:
i need magnetron specifics though
What specifics ?
The legal restriction on frequency is decided by licensing of radiation sources.

Wavelength is set by the dimensions of the resonant cavity, if you make it bigger it will have a proportionally longer wavelength = lower frequency. Every time a magnetron is turned on it heats up and physically expands, so the frequency chirps slightly downwards in the ISM band.

Magnetic field is unimportant as it simply sets the direction of curvature of the electron paths. Variation of field can give maybe a one percent change in frequency, but extreme changes will lead to higher internal losses and cooling problems.

Internal “Pi strapping” effectively short circuits all modes, (except for the most efficient), by forcing the phase between cavities to be Pi radians = 180°. Only a small proportion of the circulating internal resonant energy is extracted per cycle so the frequency cannot be pulled by changing the external tuning to select another mode or harmonic at a different frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tech99
tade said:
I know, but with modifications?change the frequency so as to resonate with the other components of food, besides the water in food.
A microwave oven does not operate at a resonant frequency of water. Any frequency will do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
15K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K