Can We Harness Electron Inertia Despite the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tgramling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Inertia
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of harnessing electron inertia in light of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. While capturing an electron's momentum is theoretically possible, practical methods would need to be large enough to minimize uncertainty in position and momentum. Betavoltaics are cited as a potential technology for this purpose, with suggestions that advancements in nanotechnology could enhance energy capture. However, the challenges of detecting and justifying the use of such small quantities of inertia are significant. Overall, the practicality of utilizing electron inertia for applications like propulsion remains highly questionable.
tgramling
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
This is a pretty general question, but could it be possble to capture and use an electrons inertia? Or does the Heisenberg uncertainty principle make this just flat out impossible
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tgramling said:
capture and use an electrons inertia

What do you mean by this?
 
I think he means momentum. The answer is yes, its possible, but your method of capturing the energy/momentum would have to have a size large enough and be positioned in such a way to make the uncertainty in the position and momentum of the particle small compared to the probability of capture of the device. Betavoltaics would be an example of this type of technology. Are you interested in this type of technology?, because there may be some potential for improvements with the development of nanotechnology and I'm sure there is a market for a cell phone that never has to be charged although you may want to steer away from the words nuclear, radioactive or atomic when marketing it.
 
tgramling said:
This is a pretty general question, but could it be possble to capture and use an electrons inertia? Or does the Heisenberg uncertainty principle make this just flat out impossible

You will be hard-pressed to not only DETECT such "inertia", but also to justify all the expense of trying to use something that minuscule.

You also can't say ask for something to be used, without indicating WHAT it will be used for. If you say that you want to use it for propulsion, I would place you in a class and ask you to calculate the momentum transfer from a single electron and let you calculate how much it would need to provide just a simple, rudimentary propulsion. It would require an absurd amount of effort.

Zz.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top