Can we identify the generation of any star?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bostonnew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generation Star
AI Thread Summary
Stars are classified into different populations based on their age and metallicity, but this classification does not strictly define their generation. The Sun is considered a second-generation star, formed from the remnants of earlier stars. The highest generation stars observed are typically younger, with many being third-generation. In the Milky Way, first-generation stars are rare, while second and third-generation stars dominate, although precise ratios vary across regions. Nearby stars may not all be siblings of the Sun, as some could originate from different supernova events, and remnants of the Sun's parent star are unlikely to exist today.
bostonnew
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I would love if someone could clarify these five questions for me:

1. Is it correctly understood that all stars are of a certain generation?

2. Which generation is the sun?

3. What is the highest generation star we know of?

4. In the Milky Way, what is the share of first generation stars vs. second generation vs. third generation etc.? What is the relative share of these within our local cluster or even for the universe?

5. Are all our nearby stars siblings to our sun? Or do we have cousins nearby (i.e. stars that evolved from another supernova explosion than our sun's parent)? Do any siblings to our sun's parent still exist?

THANKS
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
1. Not really. Stars are constantly being born and dying, and each has a different lifetime. Some last for only a few million years, while some last for 10+ billion. The Population type of a star doesn't mean anything about its generation. See here for more on that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallicity
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top