B Can we produce black holes by particle accelerators?

Click For Summary
Particle accelerators like the LHC enhance our understanding of quantum physics but are not capable of producing black holes. The energy required to create a black hole is significantly higher than what the LHC can achieve, estimated to be around 10^30 eV or more. While theoretically, a particle accelerator the size of the solar system could be constructed to reach such energy levels, practical feasibility remains questionable. Current theories suggest that the energy needed to create black holes is still uncertain and likely exceeds the capabilities of any existing or proposed accelerator. Ultimately, producing black holes with particle accelerators is not feasible with current technology and understanding.
Xforce
Messages
73
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
Thanks to CERN, we now have huge particle accelerators such as the LHC. We use them to enhance our understanding of quantum physics.
Summary: Thanks to CERN, we now have huge particle accelerators such as the LHC. We use them to enhance our understanding of quantum physics.

As everyone know,particle accelerators are huge machines that smashes atoms into pieces at near the speed of light. I have heard making antimatter by using them, which is an inefficient but the only known method. And I have heard the WIMP particles or Higgs-Boson particles that helps us study dark matter.
They are truly amazing stuff. But what about black holes? I heard that we can produce an artificial quantum-sized black hole by a particle accelerator. Of course it must be larger than LHC and the experiment will engage in space. The idea is, to accelerate a proton to such high energy that it’s wavelength shrinks to under The Planck’s length, which is 1.26*10^-35 meters(from Wikipedia). Another way is using the principal of special relativity, when the proton ‘s velocity makes its mass increases, and the Schwarzschild radius(which is 2Gm/c^2)becomes greater than the proton’s diameter(8.751^10^-16 meters). So is it feasible to make a black hole by particle accelerators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xforce said:
The idea is, to accelerate a proton to such high energy that it’s wavelength shrinks to under The Planck’s length

Xforce said:
Another way is using the principal of special relativity, when the proton ‘s velocity makes its mass increases, and the Schwarzschild radius(which is 2Gm/c^2)becomes greater than the proton’s diameter(8.751^10^-16 meters)

These descriptions are not correct. Velocity is relative; just having a reference frame in which a proton is moving at a highly relativistic velocity cannot make it into a black hole.

Particle accelerators create high energy collisions by smashing beams of particles together that are traveling in opposite directions. Just making the particles move very fast does nothing by itself.

Xforce said:
is it feasible to make a black hole by particle accelerators?

No. You would have to build an accelerator about the size of the observable universe for it to be able to smash together beams of particles with enough energy to do this.
 
I have done some further research to this, and it turn’s out the energy of a particle collision required to generate a black hole is about 10^30 eV ( according to [The Universe in a Nutshell]), which is significant higher than LHC capacity, however, it is possible to build a particle accelerator as large as the solar system in a few centuries, because in the vacuum of space, no tube is required, we can just put a few million coils around the solar system in an arrangement. Plus, coils can be build larger and more powerful, because we don’t need to worry about to dig a big tunnel underground in space.
 
Xforce said:
the energy of a particle collision required to generate a black hole is about 10^30 eV ( according to [The Universe in a Nutshell]),

A pop science book is not a valid source. The truth is that we don't know for sure what this energy is because we don't know for sure what kind of physics might come into play at these energy scales. A rough guess would be that we would need roughly the Planck energy, ##10^{28}## eV; but that's just a rough guess.

Xforce said:
which is significant higher than LHC capacity

Yes, 15 or more orders of magnitude above the LHC energy qualifies as "significant". :wink:

Xforce said:
it is possible to build a particle accelerator as large as the solar system in a few centuries, because in the vacuum of space, no tube is required, we can just put a few million coils around the solar system in an arrangement. Plus, coils can be build larger and more powerful, because we don’t need to worry about to dig a big tunnel underground in space.

All of this is possible in principle, but whether it's doable in a few centuries is more problematic. Also, I don't think an accelerator the size of the solar system would be enough to reach the Planck energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Xforce
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads