Can We Reach the Speed of Light?

AI Thread Summary
Reaching or exceeding the speed of light is theoretically impossible due to the principles of relativity, which prevent any part of a structure, like a rotating tower, from surpassing this speed. The discussion highlights that even if the tower were in space, it would still require rigidity to maintain its structure under the forces of rotation. Concerns about angular momentum and relativistic mass increase further complicate the feasibility of such a concept. Additionally, the electromagnetic interactions holding the atoms together would limit the speed at which they can communicate, leading to structural failure. Ultimately, the idea of a tower reaching light speed is not viable within the constraints of known physics.
mlip
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I don't know the formula that I would need to use in order to calculate the exact length needed to reach, or even break the speed of light, but in theory isn't this possible? Wouldnt the outer-most point of the tower be rotating with such a high velocity that it could break the speed of light, assuming it was far out enough? :surprise:
 
Science news on Phys.org
No, because even without the practical difficulties with real matter, relativity woould modify the tower all along its length to keep the tip from exceeding the speed of light. I think the tower would be seen from the ground as curled into a spiral.

Relativity can't be fooled.
 
Cool that's really a neat idea and a neat solution. I wonder how would the Earth appear to someone on top of the tower though.
 
You are assuming that your tower would be of rigid material- even theoretically, in relativity there is no rigid material.
 
But in space you wouldn't need to deal with friction or anything of the sort, why would the material need to be rigid, what kind of g forces would it need to deal with?
 
But in space you wouldn't need to deal with friction or anything of the sort, why would the material need to be rigid, what kind of g forces would it need to deal with?


Thinking back to Newton's second law, a force causes an acceleration. An acceleration is anything that changes the velocity of an object. The particles making up the tower are undergoing changes in velocity since they are rotating with the same angular velocity of the earth. The forces causing these accelerations are provided by the tower, so yes the tower would need to be rigid, or it would bend.
 
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't agree. I think it would not be possible because of conservation of angular momentum and relativistic mass increase.
 
note also that all the atoms that make up the structure of the tower are held together as a result of electromagnetic interactions between the atoms. This means the maximum speed of interaction between adjacent atoms is c, so the top end of the tower would just get ripped off.
 
Back
Top