B Can We Use Nuclear Weapons to Stop a Comet Impact?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter GaiaShield
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet Nuke
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using nuclear weapons to stop a comet impact, highlighting concerns about the effectiveness of such an approach. Key points include the need to understand the expansion velocity of vaporized water ice and the volume of ice that would be vaporized per megaton of yield. Recent studies suggest that nuclear detonation may not be viable since fragments could reassemble due to gravity. Participants advocate for diverting the comet as a more effective solution rather than attempting to destroy it. Overall, the consensus leans towards exploring alternative methods for planetary defense.
GaiaShield
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sooner-or-later, at random, the world will be faced with the threat of a large Comet impact. Our only recourse will be to Nuke it.

In order to know how large the thermonuclear device needs to be to either deflect or destroy it there are two questions:
- What is the expansion velocity of vaporized water ice in Space?
- Per Mt of yield (net) what volume/mass of water ice would be vaporized?

KISS please. I need to explain this to politicians...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GaiaShield said:
Our only recourse will be to Nuke it.
Recent studies actually show that this is not an option. It will reassemble itself under its own gravity.

The paper is here. If you do not have access, you can read the press release.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Orodruin said:
Recent studies actually show that this is not an option. It will reassemble itself under its own gravity.

The paper is here. If you do not have access, you can read the press release.

Orodruin,

Caught it when it was posted. That effect was to my point. If the expansion velocity is to low any fragments would not reach escape velocity of the target object and fall back to its center of gravity . Same could be said for vaporized mass although it would still generate thrust. Also this was a kinetic impact on an incredibly large asteroid with a very high escape velocity. Far to large for us puny humans to be expected to defend against... without antimatter devices.
 
Diverting the comet (or anything else) from its path appears to be a better solution.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
GaiaShield said:
Our only recourse will be to Nuke it.

Clearly to make a statement like that you must have considered all the issues. Why not use those thoughts as a basis for your discussion with politicians?
 
  • Haha
Likes sophiecentaur

Thread 'The Physics of unloading sand from a barge'

I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
View full post »

Similar threads

Alternative Solutions to Deflecting Asteroids or Comets From Earth
Replies
5
Views
9K
News How can an international automatic missile system prevent nuclear war?
Replies
11
Views
3K
How Does Solid Hydrogen Impact Our Understanding of Cosmology?
Replies
5
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top