Can wormholes make you travel faster then c

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat1101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Travel Wormholes
mat1101
Messages
42
Reaction score
1
I am in grade 8 so please no gradute equations
I would like to know if going through a wormhole (and survied) would you have travel faster then the speed of light creating possible time travel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

mat1101 said:
I am in grade 8 so please no gradute equations
I would like to know if going through a wormhole (and survied) would you have travel faster then the speed of light
There is no unambiguous way to answer this question. In relativity, you can only define velocity on small distance scales. For example, there is no well-defined way to say whether a distant galaxy has a certain speed relative to our galaxy. You can say it's moving away from us, but if you like you can also say that the space between us is just expanding.

If you go through the wormhole and observe your velocity relative to nearby objects that you're passing by (i.e., you confine yourself to small distance scales), then you will find that your velocity is always less than c. On the other hand, you can arrive at your destination earlier than a beam of light that got there without going through the wormhole.

A simple example is an expanding universe that is closed, i.e., that wraps around on itself in a circle. This is like a balloon being blown up. You can walk to school in the morning and get there much faster than a ray of light that was emitted from your house and wrapped around the universe before finally arriving at your school. Does that mean you went faster than light? Well, it depends on what you mean by faster than light.

mat1101 said:
creating possible time travel
Yes, any wormhole is definitely a potential time machine. There is a good discussion of this in the final chapter of this book https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393312763/?tag=pfamazon01-20 , which you can look at using Amazon's "look inside" feature.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wormhole is so theory that I guess if you travel into one, anything is possible.
 
thanks
also kind of a dumb question but can worm holes be classified under astro physics?
 
gtwace said:
Wormhole is so theory that I guess if you travel into one, anything is possible.
No, wormholes are described by general relativity.

mat1101 said:
thanks
also kind of a dumb question but can worm holes be classified under astro physics?
There aren't really sharply defined boundaries. Many astrophysicists use general relativity intensively, so they would have the skills needed to work on wormholes. But most astrophysicists are focused on describing and predicting naturally occurring phenomena, whereas there is not believed to be any natural process that could make a wormhole.
 
Wormhole is allowed by general relativity, but doesn't mean it is governed by it, cos there are other theories that allow wormholes. The rules of where you will end up after traveling through a wormhole is pretty open right now.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top