Can You Evaluate the Cross Product in Vector Integral Calculations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the cross product in the context of vector integral calculations, specifically involving vectors \(\vec{u}\) and \(\vec{v}\). Participants explore the implications of applying the cross product within integrals and the properties associated with scalar multiplication of vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss whether it is permissible to evaluate the cross product between two vectors in an integral. Questions arise regarding the conditions under which this is valid and the implications of scalar multiplication on the cross product. Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of integration steps taken in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the properties of the cross product, with some participants affirming the validity of certain mathematical statements. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the integration process, as participants continue to seek clarification and verification of their approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the order of vectors in the cross product and the implications of scalar multiplication. There is also mention of ensuring that constants in the integration are treated appropriately.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


See figure


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For an integral like this am I allowed to evaluate the cross product between the to vectors,

[tex]\vec{u}[/tex] and [tex]\vec{v}[/tex]?

If so then,

[tex]\vec{p} = \vec{u}\times\vec{v}[/tex]

and,

[tex]\int f\vec{p} = -3\int t\vec{p}[/tex]

Does this work?
 

Attachments

  • VECTORF.JPG
    VECTORF.JPG
    11.7 KB · Views: 401
Physics news on Phys.org
under what conditions should you think you cannot?
 
Yes, it is always true that [itex]\left(a\vec{u}\right)\times\vec{v}= a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex].

(But [itex]\vec{u}\times\left(a\vec{v}\right)= -a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex].)
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, it is always true that [itex]\left(a\vec{u}\right)\times\vec{v}= a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex].

(But [itex]\vec{u}\times\left(a\vec{v}\right)= -a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex].)

So,

[tex]\int f\vec{p}dt = -3\int t\vec{p}dt = \int \left(-3t^{3} - 3t\right)dt\hat{i} + \int \left(-6t^{2} + 3t\right)dt\hat{j} + \int \left(6t + 3t^{4} \right)dt\hat{k}[/tex]

then,

[tex]\int f\vec{p}dt = -3\int t\vec{p}dt = \left(\frac{-3}{4}t^{4} - \frac{3}{2}t^{2} \right)\hat{i} + \left( -2t^{3} + \frac{3}{2}t^{2} \right)\hat{j} + \left( 3t^{2} + \frac{3}{5}t^{5} \right)\hat{k} + C[/tex]

Is this correct?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, it is always true that [itex]\left(a\vec{u}\right)\times\vec{v}= a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex].

(But [itex]\vec{u}\times\left(a\vec{v}\right)= -a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex].)

what about when a = 1...

may be missing somethig, but I'd say [itex]\vec{u}\times\left(a\vec{v}\right)= a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex], if you change the order of u & v that's another story
 
Last edited:
Bump, still looking for a quick check on my answer.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, it is always true that [itex]\left(a\vec{u}\right)\times\vec{v}= a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex].

(But [itex]\vec{u}\times\left(a\vec{v}\right)= -a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex].)

lanedance said:
what about when a = 1...

may be missing somethig, but I'd say [itex]\vec{u}\times\left(a\vec{v}\right)= a\left(\vec{u}\times\vec{v}\right)[/itex], if you change the order of u & v that's another story
Yes, you are right. For some reason, I was thinking [itex]\vec{u}\times(a\vec{v})= -((a\vec{v})\times\vec{u}= -a(\vec{v}\times\vec{u})[/itex] but now we have to swap u and v back again!

[itex](a\vec{u})\times\vec{v}= \vec{u}\times(a\vec{v})= a(\vec{u}\times\vec{v})[/itex]
 
Bump, still looking to see if the route I took is the right one.
 
What part of "yes", in the second response, do you have trouble with?
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
What part of "yes", in the second response, do you have trouble with?

I was just curious whether or not I had done the integration correctly, that's all.
 
  • #11
jegues said:
So,

[tex]\int f\vec{p}dt = -3\int t\vec{p}dt = \int \left(-3t^{3} - 3t\right)dt\hat{i} + \int \left(-6t^{2} + 3t\right)dt\hat{j} + \int \left(6t + 3t^{4} \right)dt\hat{k}[/tex]

then,

[tex]\int f\vec{p}dt = -3\int t\vec{p}dt = \left(\frac{-3}{4}t^{4} - \frac{3}{2}t^{2} \right)\hat{i} + \left( -2t^{3} + \frac{3}{2}t^{2} \right)\hat{j} + \left( 3t^{2} + \frac{3}{5}t^{5} \right)\hat{k} + C[/tex]

Is this correct?

Yep, that's right. Just make sure your C is a constant vector, not a real number constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K