Can You Find a Counterexample to the Recursive Lucas and Fibonacci Relationship?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostskwid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
ghostskwid
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi I am playing around with recursive definitions of Lucas and Fibonacci sequences:

I came across a relationship

L0 + L1 + L2 + L3 ... Ln = sum(i = 0, n) Li = Ln+2 -1;

Sorry for the horrible notation, but could anyone provide a counter example using an inductive approach? I get the counter example through guessing, but am having a hard time proving it definitively.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any counterexample would show that your formula is wrong, it does not matter how you got that counterexample.

You can show this formula via induction, this is an easy example of induction.
Actually, there should be a similar relation independent of the starting values, where just the constant in the formula has to be changed.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top