Can you find the general formula for A_n+3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kezman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula General
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a general formula for the sequence defined by A_n+3 = 3A_n+2 - 3A_n+1 + A_n, with initial values A_1 = 3, A_2 = 7, and A_3 = 13. Participants suggest that A_n can be expressed as A_n = A_{n-1} + 2n, leading to a summation form A_n = 3 + ∑(2i) from i=2 to n. There is a focus on proving this formula by induction, with some confusion about the correct order of statements. Ultimately, the need to validate A_{n+1} = A_n + 2(n+1) before concluding the proof is emphasized. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in mathematical reasoning and proof techniques.
kezman
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi I have many problems trying to find the general formula and the demonstration by induction.
Let
A_1 = 3
A_2 = 7
A_3 = 13
A_n+3 = 3A_n+2 - 3A_n+1 + A_n
I could only find this.
A_n+1 = A_n + 2n
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What sort of class are you in?


A_n+1 = A_n + 2n
How did you arrive at this? It can't be right, though: it doesn't work for n=1 or n=2.

Oh, I bet you meant A_n = A_{n-1} + 2n, or A_{n+1} = A_n + 2(n+1). (Incidentally, you could try proving this formula by induction, to make sure you're on the right track)


One trick that's often useful is to not do arithmetic. If A_n = A_{n-1} + 2n, then write A_2 = 3 + 2\cdot2 instead of A_2 = 7.
 
sorry I am in my way of learning Latex.
I mean:
A_n = A_{n-1} + 2n
And the formula given in the problem is:
A_{n+3} = 3A_{n+2} - 3A_{n+1} + A_n
With the three A1 A2 A3 defined.
Ive been trying but I couldn't find the general formula.
 
Last edited:
kezman said:
...I mean:
A_n = A_{n-1} + 2n
So far so good.
Now, you can follow Hurkyl's suggestion:
A1 = 3
A2 = A1 + 2 . 2 = 3 + 2 . 2
A3 = A2 + 2 . 3 = 3 + 2 . 2 + 2 . 3
A4 = 3 + 2 . 2 + 2 . 3 + 2 . 4
A5 = 3 + 2 . 2 + 2 . 3 + 2 . 4 + 2 . 5
A6 = 3 + 2 . 2 + 2 . 3 + 2 . 4 + 2 . 5 + 2 . 6
...
An = 3 + 2 . 2 + 2 . 3 + 2 . 4 + 2 . 5 + 2 . 6 + 2 . 7 + ... + 2 . n
Now, do you see anything that can be factored out?
Can you go from here? :)
 
For
A_n = 3 + \sum\limits_{i = 2}^n 2i
then
A_1 = 3
Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
If you can prove it by induction, it's correct. :smile:
 
Induction:
1)
A_1 = 3 + \sum\limits_{i = 2}^1 2i = 3
(Is this OK?)
2) I had this result :A_{n+1} = A_n + 2(n+1)

With A_n = 3 + \sum\limits_{i = 2}^n 2i =>
A_{n+1} = 3 + \sum\limits_{i = 2}^{n+1} 2i (the upper index of the summatory in this case is (n+1))
=> A_{n+1} = 3 + \sum\limits_{i = 2}^n 2i + 2(n+1)
=> A_{n+1} = A_n + 2(n+1)

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Well, you've done it backwards!

A_{n+1} = A_n + 2(n+1)

is the statement you know to be true, whereas

A_{n+1} = 3 + \sum\limits_{i = 2}^{n+1} 2i

is the statement you were trying to prove.

(given the assumption that A_n = 3 + \sum_{i = 2}^n 2i)



(Actually, I'm assuming you've already given a proof of A_{n+1} = A_n + 2(n+1) is correct given the original recurrence relation. If you have not yet done so, then you should work with the original recurrence)
 
Yes is true.I still have to prove first A_{n+1} = A_n + 2(n+1)
 
Back
Top