MHB Can you find the length of ON using Pythagoras and similarity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alextrainer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the length of segment ON using the properties of right triangles and similarity. The Pythagorean theorem is applied to find the hypotenuse of a smaller triangle, resulting in a length of approximately 46.65. By establishing the similarity between the larger and smaller triangles, a proportion is set up to determine the length of ON, leading to a calculated value of 30. Additionally, the Pythagorean theorem is used again to find the length of segment OP, resulting in an expression involving the square root of 34. The discussion effectively demonstrates the application of geometric principles to solve for unknown lengths.
alextrainer
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In attached file, I understand 50 is the base; no idea how to use the 24 height to calculate length of ON - must have to do with property of right triangles?

View attachment 6367
 

Attachments

  • geo.jpg
    geo.jpg
    19.7 KB · Views: 119
Mathematics news on Phys.org
These are, of course, right triangles so you can use the Pythagorean theorem To determine the length of the hypotenuse of the small triangle. Then, since the angles of the large and small triangles are the same, they are similar triangles. Corresponding parts of the two right triangles are proportional.
 
HallsofIvy said:
These are, of course, right triangles so you can use the Pythagorean theorem To determine the length of the hypotenuse of the small triangle. Then, since the angles of the large and small triangles are the same, they are similar triangles. Corresponding parts of the two right triangles are proportional.

Thanks for the smaller triangle I get hypotenuse of 46.65. Then each leg and hypotenuse is multipled by a proportion?

So larger triangle would be 50 leg - no idea how to figure height or hypotenuse unless I multiple by 10/40 percent all the known lengths.
 
Let:

$$\overline{NO}=x$$

Then, by similarity, we may state:

$$\frac{x}{50}=\frac{24}{40}=\frac{3}{5}$$

Hence:

$$x=50\cdot\frac{3}{5}=10\cdot3=30$$

And then by Pythagoras:

$$\overline{OP}=\sqrt{30^2+50^2}=10\sqrt{3^2+5^2}=10\sqrt{34}$$
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
767
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K