Can you help me convert compounds with water molecules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~angel~
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compounds
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around converting manganese nitrate-6-water to manganese sulfate-4-water and calcium acetate-1-water to calcium nitrate-4-water, with confusion primarily centered on the role of water in these reactions. Participants seek clarification on the ionic equations and the process of recrystallization that leads to the formation of hydrated salts. Specific examples are provided, showing the reactions with sulfuric and nitric acids, but questions remain about how to determine the final hydration states of the products. The need for stoichiometric calculations and understanding the solubility of the acids in solution is emphasized. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of chemical conversions involving hydrates.
~angel~
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
I'm having a lot of trouble with some of these questions. Please help

Converting manganse nitrate-6-water to manganese sulfate-4-water

Converting calcium acetate-1-water to calcium nitrate-4-water.

It's the "water" bits that confuse me. I just need a couple of ionic equations to show the conversion (like dissolving it in water, etc).

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Converting,like reacting with certain compounds?

For example

Mn\left(NO_{3}\right)_{2}\cdot 6H_{2}O+H_{2}SO_{4}\rightarrow MnSO_{4}+2HNO_{3}+6H_{2}O

How do you know that by recrystalization of the reaction products u'd get MnSO_{4}\cdot 4H_{2}O...?


Daniel.
 
As for the second

Ca(CH_{3}-COO)_{2}\cdot H_{2}O+2HNO_{3}\rightarrow Ca\left(NO_{3}\right)_{2}+2CH_{3}-COOH

Again,by recrystalization,how do u know it's going to be a Ca\left(NO_{3}\right)_{2}\cdot 4H_{2}O ?



Daniel.
 
That's exactly what I'm having trouble with. Thanks for your help. :smile:
 
Well,those acids must be in solution,u can see that,doing the second one stoichiometrically,u won't get that 4 molecules of water.


Daniel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top