Can you help me find the osmolarity of this KNO3 solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oceanbreeze
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the osmolarity of a 0.500 liter solution containing 132g of KNO3, the calculation involves determining the number of moles of KNO3 first. The molar mass of KNO3 is approximately 101.1 g/mol, leading to about 1.306 moles in 132g. Since KNO3 dissociates into two ions (K+ and NO3-), the osmolarity is calculated by multiplying the moles by the number of particles, resulting in an osmolarity of 5.224 osmoles/L. The initial confusion stemmed from assuming a 1L volume instead of the correct 0.500L. The final osmolarity is confirmed to be 5.224 osmoles/L.
oceanbreeze
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I tried to solve this question, but I'm not sure if my answer is correct.

What is the osmolarity of a 0.500 liter solution containing 132g of KNO3?

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



1.306 mol/0.500 L solution x 2 mol ions/1 mol KNO3 = 5.224
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
oceanbreeze said:

Homework Statement



I tried to solve this question, but I'm not sure if my answer is correct.

What is the osmolarity of a 0.500 liter solution containing 132g of KNO3?

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



1.306 mol/1 L solution x 2 mol ions/1 mol KNO3 = 2.612

What is the volume of solution? You seem to have assumed it to be 1L.
 
It's 0.500L. I've reworked the equation, but I'm not sure how to proceed.
 
oceanbreeze said:
It's 0.500L. I've reworked the equation, but I'm not sure how to proceed.

What answer do you reach now?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top