Can You Help With Finite Element Analysis in Cylindrical Coordinates?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying the finite element method (FEM) to calculate the electric potential inside a truncated cone using cylindrical coordinates (r, phi, z). The user assumes phi-independence, reducing the problem to a 2D analysis in the (r, z) plane. The approach involves treating the vertical cross-section of the cone as a triangle and applying 2D FEM techniques, including triangular finite element grids and 2D hat functions, while transforming differential equations from Cartesian to cylindrical coordinates. The importance of correctly handling differential operators in this transformation is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Finite Element Method (FEM) principles
  • Cylindrical coordinates in mathematical modeling
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • 2D triangular finite element grids
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the transformation of differential equations from Cartesian to cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about Galerkin methods in finite element analysis
  • Explore the implementation of triangular finite element grids in software like ANSYS or COMSOL
  • Investigate the effects of phi-dependence in cylindrical coordinate FEM problems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in computational modeling and simulation, particularly those working with finite element analysis in cylindrical geometries.

colinven
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am trying to numerically calculate the electric potential inside a truncated cone using the finite element method (FEM). The cone is embedded in cylindrical coordinates (r,phi,z). I am assuming phi-independence on the potential, therefore the problem is essentially 2D; I am working only with coordinates (r,z).

I know how to do FEM in 2D using cartesian coordinates. Do any of you know how to do FEM in 3D using cylindrical coordinates; with a domain that is essentially 2D?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure if this would work, but here is the idea: Consider a vertical cross-section of the cone. It will look like a triangle. The solution on the left side of the triangle will be the same as on the right, so consider just the right side. This triangle has coordinates that look just like Cartesian x,y coordinates, except with x replaced by r and y replaced by z. Your differential equation will not have any ## \phi ## dependence. So treat it just like the Cartesian 2D case that you already know how to solve. Set up a triangular FE grid, use the 2D hat functions, etc.
 
You need to transform your equations from 2d Cartesian to 2d cylindrical, taking care on all the differential operators (not sure what equations you're using). You can then discretise these using conventional finite element techniques (e.g galerkin or similar). Note: Cartesian xy will yield different solutions to rz
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K