Can you please explain how to factorize

  • Thread starter Thread starter sarah786
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
sarah786
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Can you please explain how to factorize x4+2x2+9
If i do it by quadratic formula, i get complex roots ... in my book, it has been factorized to
(x2+2x+3)(x2-2x + 3)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


sarah786 said:
Can you please explain how to factorize x4+2x2+9
If i do it by quadratic formula, i get complex roots ... in my book, it has been factorized to
(x2+2x+3)(x2-2x + 3)

Which complex roots did you get?
 


sarah786 said:
Can you please explain how to factorize x4+2x2+9
If i do it by quadratic formula, i get complex roots ... in my book, it has been factorized to
(x2+2x+3)(x2-2x + 3)

When it says factorize over the reals, it means your factors have to have real coefficients. A root of x-(a+bi) does not have all real coefficients. Also remember that any real quadratic with a complex root also has a complex conjugate as its other root. So you can also work backwards from the two conjugates to find the real quadratic that has those roots.
 


your equation can be written as
X4 + 6X2 - 4X2 + 9
= X4 + 6X2+9 - 4X2
= ( X2 + 3 )2 - (2X)2
= ( X2+3+2X) (X2+3- 2X)
 
Last edited:


sarah786 said:
Can you please explain how to factorize x4+2x2+9
If i do it by quadratic formula, i get complex roots ... in my book, it has been factorized to
(x2+2x+3)(x2-2x + 3)
Let u=x2. Then you need to solve u2 +2u +9, and take square roots of both solutions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
207
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
147
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top