Can You Prove (A ∩ B) - C Equals (A - C) ∩ (B - C) in Set Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter geforce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete
geforce
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Prove that (A n B) - C = (A - C) n (B - C).

n = intersect
≠ε = not a member

I got the first one by doing:
(xεA ^xεB) ^X≠εC ( by identity law and compliment law)


where would I go on from now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so basically you have to prove the equality of sets. forward way is to let x\in(A\cap B)\setminus C be arbitrary. Then as you have shown

x\in A\;x\in B\;\; x\notin C

which means that x is A and not in C AND x is in B and not in C. So just combine that to arrive at the right side. Then proceed to the reverse direction.
 
What do you mean as in "(A∩B)∖C"to be arbitrary and I have to show how it goes from (A∩B) -C to (A-C) ∩ (B-C)
 
?...
 
when you have to prove that two sets are equal you have to prove that

A\subseteq B\mbox{ and }B\subseteq A

So to prove A\subseteq B you take arbitrary member of A and then prove that
its also member of B. And similar proof for proving B\subseteq A
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top