Can you prove a theorem from Bergmann chapter 8 using Fig. 8?

  • Thread starter Thread starter supakorn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
supakorn
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
From Bergmann chapter 8.Please show that (see at Fig. below)...thank you.
 

Attachments

  • B1.GIF
    B1.GIF
    1.1 KB · Views: 441
  • B2.GIF
    B2.GIF
    995 bytes · Views: 463
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like a homework problem.
What have you tried?
What is \varphi? Does it have any special properties?
 
it not HW but i read and try to prove.For PHI, it is a skewsymmetric.
 
I'm Done (but Not Sure).phi Defined On The Flat Space,i Will Post My Answer Next Time.now I'm Happy.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top