Can You Solve Graphical Vector Problems Using Only Math and Integration?

AI Thread Summary
It is possible to solve graphical vector problems using only integration and mathematical methods without relying on graphical vector addition. While some problems may become more complex when approached this way, many can still be resolved through mathematical intuition and visual aids. The discussion highlights a concern about potentially needing to solve problems graphically in an exam, with a strategy in mind to seek partial credit through mathematical solutions. Participants express a lack of confidence in graphical methods but emphasize the effectiveness of mathematical approaches. Overall, the consensus is that while graphical methods exist, they are not strictly necessary for solving vector problems.
isukatphysics69
Messages
453
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


I have an exam on vectors and 2 dimensional motion today. I NEED to know if it is possible to solve any GRAPHICAL VECTOR PROBLEM using only INTEGRATION AND MATH WITHOUT ADDING VECTORS TOGETHER GRAPHICALLY. So given any word problem that is supposed to be solved using that stupid graphic method, you can also just solve with math and intuition and pictures right?? I have no frikkin clue how to do it the graphical way and i have solved tons of 2d motion problems using just math. Really hoping the prof doesn't try to make us do it graphically but if he does i am planning to get partial credit by solving it without adding vectors and integrating vectors.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
isukatphysics69 said:
So given any word problem that is supposed to be solved using that stupid graphic method, you can also just solve with math and intuition and pictures right?
Sure.
It can be more complicated in some problems.

Adding vectors graphically is really not magic.
 
isukatphysics69 said:
I have no frikkin clue how to do it the graphical way
Can you give an example problem?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top