Can You Solve This Circuit Using Kirchhoff's Laws?

  • Thread starter Thread starter miss.bossyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a circuit using Kirchhoff's Laws by identifying nodes, loops, and current variables. Participants are asked to determine the number of nodes and loops in the circuit, as well as the feasibility of solving for all currents. They must set up the corresponding loop and node equations without solving them, while clearly indicating current directions on a provided diagram. There is a concern about missing information in the circuit diagram, particularly regarding connections, which could render the problem unsolvable. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in circuit representation for effective problem-solving.
miss.bossyy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Identify the number and location of each of the items below. Assume that the resistances and source voltage are known.



Use the gray highlighted letters. Identify voltage drops across resistor Ri as Vi.





- How many nodes are there in this circuit? Where? ________________________

- How many loops possible? Where? ________________________



- How many current variables are there? ________________________

- Is this system solvable? (i.e., can you solve ________________________

for all of the currents?) Why?

b.) Set up the loop and node equations using Kirkhoff’s Laws (but do not solve them). Clearly identify the node or loop, including all directions, associated with each equation.

DRAW EACH CURRENT ON THE DIAGRAM ABOVE, CLEARLY SHOWING ITS DIRECTION!

Use the gray highlighted letters. Identify voltage drops across resistor Ri as Vi. (For example, the voltage drop across R1 is V1.)

c.) What is the algebraic method used for solving this system? (name?)
 

Attachments

  • fa7c05b09372141c954cdda9dd8e1329.jpg
    fa7c05b09372141c954cdda9dd8e1329.jpg
    8.9 KB · Views: 411
Physics news on Phys.org


We need you to start the problem off. Also, the figure you've given is missing some information. I, or anyone else, would need to know the connections that are there. If everything is connected then something is wrong, or it is a pointless problem, because you have 3 short circuits.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top