Can You Solve this Complex Equation Derived from a Gambling Strategy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rishijin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    gambling Strategy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a complex equation derived from a gambling strategy, expressed as Y = (X * 2 + 1) + ((X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) and its simplifications. The original poster struggles with algebraic shortcuts and seeks assistance to find the value of X. Respondents suggest possible simplified forms of the equation, indicating it could be either Y = 31X + 26 or Y = 30X + 27. There is also a query regarding the relevance of the equation to gambling strategies. The conversation highlights the challenges of algebraic simplification and its application in gambling contexts.
Rishijin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am just no good at math these days and I was wondering if someone could solve this equation that I derived from a popular gambling strategy. I would definitely save time for me if I knew X. I suppose it isn't that I'm bad at math, as I have a natural talent for it, but I don't remember any algebraic shortcuts on simplification, so this would take me a while. Thanks to anyone who helps!

Y = (X * 2 + 1) + (( X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) + ((( X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) + (((( X * 2 + 1 ) * 2 + 1 ) * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Y=30x+26 It is just simple algebra I believe.
 
Rishijin said:
I am just no good at math these days and I was wondering if someone could solve this equation that I derived from a popular gambling strategy. I would definitely save time for me if I knew X. I suppose it isn't that I'm bad at math, as I have a natural talent for it, but I don't remember any algebraic shortcuts on simplification, so this would take me a while. Thanks to anyone who helps!

Y = (X * 2 + 1) + (( X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) + ((( X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) + (((( X * 2 + 1 ) * 2 + 1 ) * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1)


Is it possible that you are using "X*2+ 1" to mean X2+ 1?
 
I think it is either y = 31x +26 or y = 30x + 27.

Either way, thanks for simplifying it for me.
 
Rishijin: I think it is either y = 31x +26 or y = 30x + 27.


Might I ask, what does it have to do with gambling?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top