Can you use integration by parts?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of the expression ∫ x df(x) and the application of integration by parts. Participants clarify that df(x) represents a differential, leading to the interpretation of the integral as a Riemann-Stieltjes integral when f(x) is not differentiable. The correct approach involves using integration by parts, where u = x and dv = df(x), resulting in the formula ∫ x df = x f - ∫ f dx. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of knowing the function f(x) for proper integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically integration by parts.
  • Familiarity with Riemann-Stieltjes integrals and their definitions.
  • Knowledge of differential calculus and the concept of differentials.
  • Ability to manipulate functions and their inverses in calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Riemann-Stieltjes integrals and their applications.
  • Learn the integration by parts formula and practice its application on various functions.
  • Explore the properties of differentiable and non-differentiable functions in calculus.
  • Investigate the concept of function inverses and their role in integration.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in advanced integration techniques, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Riemann-Stieltjes integrals and integration by parts.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
How would you integrate this:

## \int x df(x) ##

In general, how is this solved: ## \int 1df(x) ##

Can you use integration by parts? I tried, but kept getting 0 since I let ## 1 = u## but then ##du = 0## for later purposes. Also, if ## df(x) = u ## then I am still stumped on how to take the derivative of ##df(x)## ...is it even possible?

Any help would be great!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:
How would you integrate this:

## \int x df(x) ##

In general, how is this solved: ## \int 1df(x) ##

Can you use integration by parts? I tried, but kept getting 0 since I let ## 1 = u## but then ##du = 0## for later purposes. Also, if ## df(x) = u ## then I am still stumped on how to take the derivative of ##df(x)## ...is it even possible?

Any help would be great!

This doesn't look right is the df(x) from y=f(x) and so its really a dy? so that you have the integral ## \int x dy ##

Can you give the whole problem and what book it came from?

if its by parts then ##\int udv ## = uv - ## \int vdu ##

so you dv would be df(x) and v =f(x) and u would be x so we get:

##\int xdf ## = xf - ## \int fdx ##
 
Last edited:
If you place a problem in this homework section, you are supposed to follow the homework format. Can you please do that.

As jedishrfu says, your problem is not correctly stated. If you are looking at ##\int xdx## that is easily solved. If by df(x) you mean f'(x), you should write it as ##\int xf'(x)dx##.

As you've written it, it is a Riemann-Stieltjes integral; in that case we can't proceed without knowing what f(x) is.

Please clarify.
 
jedishrfu said:
This doesn't look right is the df(x) from y=f(x) and so its really a dy? so that you have the integral ## \int x dy ##

Can you give the whole problem and what book it came from?

if its by parts then ##\int udv ## = uv - ## \int vdu ##

so you dv would be df(x) and v =f(x) and u would be x so we get:

##\int xdf ## = xf - ## \int fdx ##

I am just wondering what forms you can transform ##\int xdy## into if y is a function of x. I am trying to manipulate another expression, but seem to be stuck once given this problem.
 
Without knowing what y is as a function of x, you can only do the integration by parts rule as mentioned in earlier posts and that's it.
 
I think you are asking how to integrate functions w.r.t. functions other than x.

That is

## \int g(x)d(f(x)) ##

The general approach I think is to take

## f(x)=t ##

## d(f(x))=dt ##

also express x as

x = f^{-1}(t)

and finally put this value of x in g(x) to get a simple integral as

\int g(f^{-1}(t))dt

which can be solved by usual techniques. After solving, again substitute t=f(x) to get your answer.
 
Of course this is provided ##f## is injective so ##f^{-1}## makes sense as a function.
 
If f is a differentiable function, then \int x df= \int x \frac{df}{dx}dx[/tex]<br /> <br /> If f is not differentiable but is increasing function then \int x df is not a Riemann integral but is, rather, a Stieljes integral.<br /> <br /> (A Stieljes integral is defined in a way similar to the Riemann integral by dividing the interval into subintervals of length \Delta x (which might vary from subinterval to subinterval), approximating the integral by the sum \sum g(x_i) \Delta x where x_i is a point in the ith subinterval. The definition of the Riemann integral, \int g(x)dx takes \Delta x to be the length of each subinterval, \alpha_{i+ 1}- \alpha_i, while the Stieljes integral, \int g(x) df, with f an increasing function (not necessarily differentiable or even continuous) \Delta x= f(\alpha_{ix+1}- f(\alpha_i).)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
HallsofIvy said:
If f is a differentiable function, then \int x df= \int x \frac{df}{dx}dx

If f is not differentiable but is increasing function then \int x df
is not a Riemann integral but is, rather, a Stieljes integral.

(A Stieljes integral is defined in a way similar to the Riemann integral by dividing the interval into subintervals of length \Delta x (which might vary from subinterval to subinterval), approximating the integral by the sum \sum g(x_i) \Delta x where x_i is a point in the ith subinterval. The definition of the Riemann integral, \int g(x)dx takes \Delta x to be the length of each subinterval, \alpha_{i+ 1}- \alpha_i, while the Stieljes integral, \int g(x) df, with f an increasing function (not necessarily differentiable or even continuous) \Delta x= f(\alpha_{ix+1}- f(\alpha_i).)

...fixed the itex tag of HallsOfIvy post...
 
  • #10
Wow, thank you for the great explanation HoI!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K