Can you use integration by parts?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the expression ## \int x df(x) ##, with participants exploring the implications of using integration by parts and the nature of the differential ## df(x) ##. The context includes considerations of Riemann-Stieltjes integrals and the conditions under which these integrals can be evaluated.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of using integration by parts and express confusion regarding the treatment of ## df(x) ##. There are questions about whether ## df(x) ## can be interpreted as a derivative or if it should be treated as a different form of integral. Some suggest rewriting the integral in terms of ## dy ## and question the assumptions about the function involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem using integration by parts, while others emphasize the need for clarification on the function ## f(x) ## to proceed further.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted requirement for the original poster to follow the homework format, and some participants mention the necessity of knowing the specific function to evaluate the integral correctly. The discussion also highlights the distinction between Riemann and Stieltjes integrals based on the differentiability of the function involved.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
How would you integrate this:

## \int x df(x) ##

In general, how is this solved: ## \int 1df(x) ##

Can you use integration by parts? I tried, but kept getting 0 since I let ## 1 = u## but then ##du = 0## for later purposes. Also, if ## df(x) = u ## then I am still stumped on how to take the derivative of ##df(x)## ...is it even possible?

Any help would be great!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:
How would you integrate this:

## \int x df(x) ##

In general, how is this solved: ## \int 1df(x) ##

Can you use integration by parts? I tried, but kept getting 0 since I let ## 1 = u## but then ##du = 0## for later purposes. Also, if ## df(x) = u ## then I am still stumped on how to take the derivative of ##df(x)## ...is it even possible?

Any help would be great!

This doesn't look right is the df(x) from y=f(x) and so its really a dy? so that you have the integral ## \int x dy ##

Can you give the whole problem and what book it came from?

if its by parts then ##\int udv ## = uv - ## \int vdu ##

so you dv would be df(x) and v =f(x) and u would be x so we get:

##\int xdf ## = xf - ## \int fdx ##
 
Last edited:
If you place a problem in this homework section, you are supposed to follow the homework format. Can you please do that.

As jedishrfu says, your problem is not correctly stated. If you are looking at ##\int xdx## that is easily solved. If by df(x) you mean f'(x), you should write it as ##\int xf'(x)dx##.

As you've written it, it is a Riemann-Stieltjes integral; in that case we can't proceed without knowing what f(x) is.

Please clarify.
 
jedishrfu said:
This doesn't look right is the df(x) from y=f(x) and so its really a dy? so that you have the integral ## \int x dy ##

Can you give the whole problem and what book it came from?

if its by parts then ##\int udv ## = uv - ## \int vdu ##

so you dv would be df(x) and v =f(x) and u would be x so we get:

##\int xdf ## = xf - ## \int fdx ##

I am just wondering what forms you can transform ##\int xdy## into if y is a function of x. I am trying to manipulate another expression, but seem to be stuck once given this problem.
 
Without knowing what y is as a function of x, you can only do the integration by parts rule as mentioned in earlier posts and that's it.
 
I think you are asking how to integrate functions w.r.t. functions other than x.

That is

## \int g(x)d(f(x)) ##

The general approach I think is to take

## f(x)=t ##

## d(f(x))=dt ##

also express x as

[itex]x = f^{-1}(t)[/itex]

and finally put this value of x in g(x) to get a simple integral as

[itex]\int g(f^{-1}(t))dt[/itex]

which can be solved by usual techniques. After solving, again substitute t=f(x) to get your answer.
 
Of course this is provided ##f## is injective so ##f^{-1}## makes sense as a function.
 
If f is a differentiable function, then [itex]\int x df= \int x \frac{df}{dx}dx[/tex]<br /> <br /> If f is not differentiable but is increasing function then [itex]\int x df[/itex] is not a Riemann integral but is, rather, a Stieljes integral.<br /> <br /> (A Stieljes integral is defined in a way similar to the Riemann integral by dividing the interval into subintervals of length [itex]\Delta x[/itex] (which might vary from subinterval to subinterval), approximating the integral by the sum [itex]\sum g(x_i) \Delta x[/itex] where [itex]x_i[/itex] is a point in the ith subinterval. The definition of the Riemann integral, [itex]\int g(x)dx[/itex] takes [itex]\Delta x[/itex] to be the length of each subinterval, [itex]\alpha_{i+ 1}- \alpha_i[/itex], while the Stieljes integral, [itex]\int g(x) df[/itex], with f an increasing function (not necessarily differentiable or even continuous) [itex]\Delta x= f(\alpha_{ix+1}- f(\alpha_i)[/itex].)[/itex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
HallsofIvy said:
If f is a differentiable function, then [itex]\int x df= \int x \frac{df}{dx}dx[/itex]

If f is not differentiable but is increasing function then [itex]\int x df[/itex]
is not a Riemann integral but is, rather, a Stieljes integral.

(A Stieljes integral is defined in a way similar to the Riemann integral by dividing the interval into subintervals of length [itex]\Delta x[/itex] (which might vary from subinterval to subinterval), approximating the integral by the sum [itex]\sum g(x_i) \Delta x[/itex] where [itex]x_i[/itex] is a point in the ith subinterval. The definition of the Riemann integral, [itex]\int g(x)dx[/itex] takes [itex]\Delta x[/itex] to be the length of each subinterval, [itex]\alpha_{i+ 1}- \alpha_i[/itex], while the Stieljes integral, [itex]\int g(x) df[/itex], with f an increasing function (not necessarily differentiable or even continuous) [itex]\Delta x= f(\alpha_{ix+1}- f(\alpha_i)[/itex].)

...fixed the itex tag of HallsOfIvy post...
 
  • #10
Wow, thank you for the great explanation HoI!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K