Cant get my head around gaussians, so easy aswell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physical101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Head
physical101
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi there was wondering if some one could help me?
I think i understand what a gaussian is, its a normal distirbution where the distribution of data symmetrically tails off from the mean in both directions. I have been looking at FTIR error analysis and have constantly read that error is normally distributed. I have thought that this means that the majority of error introduced in the analysis is distributed around the mean.

I have also read that we should consider the distribution to stationary, and I have come to think of this as meaning that for for each signal the noise is independant.

My question is when viewing the normal distribution of error for stationary error points in books the mean is always zero.

Do i take this too mean that the mean is actually a stable error value and that the + and - points of inflection are deviations away from this stable value. So does this mean that in any normal distributions of error that the mean will always be 0?

So confused and would really appreciate it if any can help, i know its a bit basic for this site

thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The mean error being zero is an assumption about the overall bias in a linear system: if y = A + B x + u and a and b are the estimated values for A and B (estimated from data), then E[y] = E[a] + E x + E. If E[a] = A (meaning a is an unbiased estimator of A), E = B (b is an unbiased estimator of B), and I want E[y] = y, then E = 0 has to be the case.

Stationarity means that E is not changing over time, so there's no upward or downward drift (in an expectational or distributional sense) between any two time periods.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top