Capacitance between two adjacent long thin plates

  • Thread starter Thread starter theHermes5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance Plates
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the capacitance between two adjacent long thin plates, the standard formula C = ε0 * εR * A / d is not applicable due to the unique geometry of the plates. The plates' dimensions, with a significant length and minimal width, complicate the situation, making it difficult to derive an analytic formula. Simulation software like COMSOL is recommended for accurate capacitance calculations in such configurations. Users are encouraged to rely on numerical methods or simulations to obtain capacitance values for non-standard geometries. Accurate modeling in simulation software is essential for achieving reliable results in capacitive sensor design.
theHermes5
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I am working on a project for the design of a capacitive sensor. In order to do that, I am required to compute capacitance using a simulation software like COMSOL. As I want to compare my simulation results with the theoretical results, I would like to know the formula to be used for the capacitance.

It is not C= epsilon0*epsilonR*A/d as the plates are long and thin like this:

------------------- --------------------
| | | |
-------------------- ---------------------

I hope this diagram makes sense. ( Consider the plates to be of large length ( in the order of 0.1mm) and very small width ( in the order of 0.005mm). I want to calculated capacitance between these two plates.

Can you help me with the formula?

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your drawing isn't clear. Are the "plates" supposed to be coplanar and end to end (like a ribbon that, halfway down its length, has been cut across to make two shorter ribbons)? If so, there is no analytic formula for capacitance.
 
Thanks for your reply.

The plates are like as shown in attachment.

Now, can you help me with the capacitance formula?
 

Attachments

  • plates.jpg
    plates.jpg
    3.5 KB · Views: 593
I don't know of any analytic formulas for this case.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top