Capacitance ( getting started)

  • Thread starter Thread starter yikes_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of a spherical capacitor composed of two insulating spherical shells with different dielectric constants, situated between two metallic shells and separated by a vacuum gap. The user expresses uncertainty about how to approach the problem without numerical values and seeks guidance on starting the calculations. They consider whether to treat the system as two capacitors in series or as a single capacitor with combined equations. The conversation highlights the importance of using Gauss' law to determine the electric field and subsequently calculate the voltage between the spheres. The user acknowledges the complexity added by the vacuum gap, realizing that three sections must be analyzed to find the electric field.
yikes_physics
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spherical capacitor is made of two insulating spherical shells with different dielectric constants k1 and k2 situated between two spherical metallic shells and separated by a vacuum gap. Geometrical dimensions of the cross-section are as shown in figure 2. Calculate the capacitance of this system.

Homework Equations


C= Q/V(subscript ab) (couldnt figure out the formatting for subscripts :(


The Attempt at a Solution


I honestly have no idea on how to do this, so that is why i am not looking for help getting the answer, i would just like some help on where to start. Problems without numbers really throw me through a loop and i can usually get them when i get a little jump start.

i believe that i should begin by calculating the area of the insulating spheres with constants k1 and k2 and plug into the equation? or should i treat it as 1 spherical capacitor inside another? this gets 2 equations 4\pi\xi(r(sub b)r(sub a))/(r(sub b) - r(sub a)) and 4\pi\xi(r(sub d)r(sub c))/(r(sub d) - r(sub c)) and treat that as 1 big capacitor?

in this way i get 4\pi\xi(r(sub d)r(sub b))/(r(sub d) - r(sub b))...does this sound right or am i off in the wrong direction?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
What are: 4(r(sub b)r(sub a))/(r(sub b) - r(sub a)) and 4(r(sub d)r(sub c))/(r(sub d) - r(sub c)) ?

Let the charge on the inside sphere be Q... assume Q>0. let the charge on the outside sphere be -Q.

calculate the voltage between the 2 spheres... first get the field using Gauss' law (you'll have two parts to get the field within each of the dielectrics)... then the integral of -E.dr going from the inner sphere to the outer... that gives the voltage between the 2.

Then C = |Q/V|.
 
4(r(sub b)r(sub a))/(r(sub b) - r(sub a)) and 4(r(sub d)r(sub c))/(r(sub d) - r(sub c)) are the 2 little spherical capacitors made up of spheres with radii a and b for the first one and spheres with radii c and d for the second one. no numbers are given, i have to solve C in terms of the radii and the other variables...which is why i don't like these questions, lol.

ill give it another shot, and i appreciate your help in this matter.

take care
 
yikes_physics said:
4(r(sub b)r(sub a))/(r(sub b) - r(sub a)) and 4(r(sub d)r(sub c))/(r(sub d) - r(sub c)) are the 2 little spherical capacitors made up of spheres with radii a and b for the first one and spheres with radii c and d for the second one. no numbers are given, i have to solve C in terms of the radii and the other variables...which is why i don't like these questions, lol.

ill give it another shot, and i appreciate your help in this matter.

take care

I forgot about the vacuum gap... so you have 3 sections to get the field for instead of 2 like I initially thought...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top