Capacitance, voltage, distance and charge?

AI Thread Summary
When a capacitor connected to a battery has its plate separation doubled, the capacitance decreases by half while the voltage remains constant. This results in a proportional decrease in charge, specifically halving the initial charge on the capacitor. The relationship between charge, voltage, and capacitance is described by the equation Q = VC, confirming that as capacitance drops, charge must also decrease. Additionally, the energy lost by the capacitor during this process is calculated, showing that energy is returned to the battery. Overall, the charge on the capacitor decreases when the plate separation is increased.
seto6
Messages
248
Reaction score
0
NOT HOME WORK QUESTION!

If a capacitor is attached to a battery, initially the separation between the capacitor plates is D then the distance is doubled(2D). The voltage should remain the same because it is still attached to a battery. C=E0A/D so the capacitance decrease by factor of 2. my question is that since the capacitance decreased, the voltage or the charge must have decreased. so did the charge decrease or increase?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V remains the same, the charge on the capacitor halves.
 
my question is that since the capacitance decreased, the voltage or the charge must have decreased. so did the charge decrease or increase?
Yes the charge on the capacitor certainly did decrease. Exactly half of the initial charge did in fact flow back into the battery.

It's interesting to calculate the electrical energies involved in this case. It's relatively easy to show that a stored energy of \frac{1}{4} C_0 V^2 Joules was lost by the capacitor while a net energy of \frac{1}{2} C_0 V^2 Joules was returned to the battery.

I'll leave it as an exercise to figure out where the other \frac{1}{4} C_0 V^2 J of energy came from.
 
Last edited:
seto6 said:
NOT HOME WORK QUESTION!

If a capacitor is attached to a battery, initially the separation between the capacitor plates is D then the distance is doubled(2D). The voltage should remain the same because it is still attached to a battery. C=E0A/D so the capacitance decrease by factor of 2. my question is that since the capacitance decreased, the voltage or the charge must have decreased. so did the charge decrease or increase?

Charge, voltage and capacitance are related by the equation Q = VC, where Q is the charge on the plates of the capacitor, C is the capacitance of the capacitor, and V is the voltage dropped across the capacitor.

So if you double the plate separation distance, and you know that the capacitance is inversely related to that distance, then you must have cut the capacitance by half.

C = EOER(A/d) and if d is now 2d then C' = EOER(A/2d) = (1/2)C, so the new capacitance C' is 1/2 the old capacitance, C.

So, now plug that back into the function relating the voltage and capacitance to the charge on the plates. Let Q be the charge that was on the plates when the capacitor plates were separated by a distance, d, and let Q' be the charge on the plates by separating them by twice the distance:

Q = VC
Q' = V(1/2)C = (1/2)VC
Q' = (1/2)Q

The amount of charge on the plates by separating them by twice the distance they were separated at causes the charge on the plates to drop by half also.

Many Smiles,
Craig :smile:
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top