Capacitor and energy conservation

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the line integral of an electric field around a rectangular path near a parallel plate capacitor, it is clarified that the electric field behaves differently depending on whether the plates are considered infinite or finite. For an ideal capacitor with infinitely large plates, the electric field is uniform, and the line integral along paths parallel to the electric field is zero, while the integrals along the segments perpendicular to the field cancel each other out. When dealing with finite plates, the electric field becomes more complex, which affects the assumptions about the integrals. The discussion emphasizes that the electric potential is unique, conservative, and path-independent, reinforcing the principle of energy conservation in electrostatics.
spacetime
Messages
119
Reaction score
2
Say, you have a parallel plate ideal capacitor and you choose a rectangular path, one side of which lies inside the region of electric field and the side parallel to that lies outside it.
The other two sides are obviously perpendicular to the field.

If I take this rectangular path then how is the line integral along this path zero. Because it is positive for one path and zero for three others.
What is wrong here?
The line integral must be zero for conservation of energy.


spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The E-field you are probably having in mind is for an ideal plate capacitor with the plates being (infinitely expanded) planes. Thus, your parallel path lying outside the E-field doesn´t exist.
If, on the other hand, you consider finite plates your E-field becomes more complicated and thus your assumtions on the integrals (two lines being perpendicular to the field) are not true.
 
Try this: the field is perpendicular to the plate. So, the line integrals along the two segments perpendicular to the plate cancel out. Note, this particular problem is often used to illustrate the various integral relations governing the eletric field.

(Clearly, the integrals along the paths parallel to the capacitor plate are zero. All of this, of course, says that the electric potential exists, and, given a zero point, is unique, conservative, and path independent.)

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top