Capacitor Problem involving a slab of Copper between a Capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simon777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Copper
AI Thread Summary
A copper slab of thickness 1.370 mm is inserted into a parallel-plate capacitor with a capacitance of 9.00×10^-11 F and a gap of 10.0 mm. The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of stored energy before and after the slab's insertion, focusing on the equivalent capacitance of two sections formed by the slab. The key point is that the capacitance for each section is derived from the formula C = (epsilon nought * Area) / distance, leading to the conclusion that the effective distance for capacitance calculations must account for both sections. The confusion arose regarding whether to use the full distance or half the distance after inserting the slab, which was clarified by realizing the need to consider the combined distance of both capacitors. Ultimately, the correct approach involves using the adjusted distance of d-b for accurate capacitance calculations.
Simon777
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A slab of copper of thickness b = 1.370 mm is thrust into a parallel-plate capacitor of C = 9.00×10-11 F of gap d = 10.0 mm, as shown in the figure; it is centered exactly halfway between the plates.

If a charge q = 1.00×10-6 C is maintained on the plates, what is the ratio of the stored energy before to that after the slab is inserted?


I already know how to solve this problem. I just have a question about one of the steps. You need to find capacitance equivalent of c1 and c2 and since area and distance are the same, c1=c2. You end up with

C equivalent= c1/2

Now c1= (epsilon nought * Area)/ distance

so you just plug this in

Why do I only get the right answer when the distance is d-b? If you are just referring to c1, shouldn't it be half of d-b? Why use the combined distance of capacitor 1 and 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I figured it out. I had to half d-b just like I thought. For some reason I unknowingly halved d-b and got the right answer and confused myself.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top