Capacitors in Series: Intuitive Understanding Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the intuitive understanding of capacitors in series, particularly why the total capacitance is less than that of any individual capacitor. Participants explore various analogies and approaches to clarify this concept, including comparisons to resistors and energy considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about why adding more capacitors in series results in lower total capacitance, questioning the intuitive understanding of this phenomenon.
  • One participant draws an analogy to resistors, noting that while resistors in series increase resistance, capacitors in series decrease capacitance, suggesting a parallel in understanding these components.
  • Another participant proposes using an energy approach to compare the total energies stored in capacitors connected in series versus parallel, suggesting this might provide a clearer intuition.
  • A further explanation discusses the relationship between capacitance and impedance, noting that the total impedance of capacitors in series is the sum of their individual impedances, leading to the formula 1/Ct = 1/C1 + 1/C2.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the algebraic relationship of capacitance in series but express differing views on how to intuitively understand this relationship. No consensus is reached on a singular intuitive explanation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the complexity introduced when capacitors are not identical and the dependence of impedance on frequency, indicating that these factors may complicate the understanding of the series capacitance concept.

matangi7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I understand algebraically that when capacitors are in series, the total capacitance is less than any individual capacitance, but I do not understand this intuitively. How can this be possible? Shouldn't more capacitors equal more capacitance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
matangi7 said:
I understand algebraically that when capacitors are in series, the total capacitance is less than any individual capacitance, but I do not understand this intuitively. How can this be possible? Shouldn't more capacitors equal more capacitance?
That's exactly like saying that more resistors should mean more resistance, but when they are in parallel it is actually LESS resistance, it's only more resistance when they are in series. Similarly, capacitors in parallel means more capacitance and in series means less.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995
matangi7 said:
I understand algebraically that when capacitors are in series, the total capacitance is less than any individual capacitance, but I do not understand this intuitively.
Maybe the energy approach could make it intuitive for you. Compare the total energies stored in two capacitors in both series and parallel connections, keeping the source voltage constant. Which one gives more stored energy?
 
It's easiest to understand capacitors in parallel. The capacitance of a single capacitor is proportional to the area of the plates so putting two capacitors is a bit like increasing the area of the plates of a single capacitor. It's slightly more complicated if the capacitors aren't identical but the general idea is that in parallel the capacitances add together.

As for series.. Capacitors have an impedance (Z). If you haven't studied impedance yet then think of it a bit like resistance for AC signals. It actually depends on the frequency of the AC signal but perhaps not worry about that for the moment. The impedance of a capacitor is inversely proportional to the capacitance (eg 1/C) so the larger the capacitance the lower the impedance and the better it conducts an AC signal. When putting two capacitors in series the total impedance is the sum of the two individual impedances so Zt = Z1 + Z2. In terms of capacitance that becomes 1/Ct = I/C1 + 1/C2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K