Will CO Convert to CO2 Quickly in High Temperatures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter afcwestwarrior
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Co2 Reactions
AI Thread Summary
High temperatures in internal combustion engines favor the exothermic combustion reaction of carbon monoxide (CO) with oxygen (O2) to form carbon dioxide (CO2). The discussion highlights the importance of Gibbs free energy calculations to determine the spontaneity of these reactions, indicating that both the forward and reverse reactions are spontaneous but the reverse is endothermic. Despite the thermodynamic favorability, the rapid nature of engine operation limits complete conversion of CO to CO2. The consensus is that while reactions are thermodynamically spontaneous, they do not achieve full conversion due to time constraints. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing combustion efficiency in engines.
afcwestwarrior
Messages
453
Reaction score
0
im wondering what reaction would likely occur
2NO (g) → N2(g) + O2(g) or the reverse

2CO (g) + O2(g) → 2CO2 (g) or the reverse

well the first one would occur if it were the reverse because of the high temperatures in the engine, but I am wondering about carbon monoxide, what do you guys think
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wait a minute, All internal combustion engines depend on the exothermic chemical process of combustion
so therefore these are more likely to occur the way i wrote them
 
Calculate the change in the gibbs free energy for each reaction and the reverse from the thermodynamic data in the back of any general chemistry text. That will tell you which is going to more spontaneously occur.
 
i did, and the ones i wrote are both spontaneous, but the reverse are endothermic
 
Thermaldynamically, those reaction are spontaneous, but the time is so short that they can not convert completely. Reactions take time.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top