Car going around banked curve with no friction

AI Thread Summary
A racecourse with a 200m radius and a 10-degree banking angle requires calculating the maximum speed a car can maintain without friction. The formula used is tan(Theta) = v^2/(gR), leading to the calculation of speed. After some discussion, the correct maximum speed was determined to be approximately 18.59 m/s, correcting an earlier miscalculation of 345 m/s². The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the underlying principles of Newton's laws in solving dynamics problems. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in applying physics formulas to real-world scenarios.
chaotiiic
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a racecourse is designed with curves with a radius of 200m and a 10degree banking. What is the maximum speed a car can negotiate the curve without friction?


Homework Equations


Newtons 3 laws


The Attempt at a Solution


tanTheta = v^2/gR
tan10 = v^2/(9.8 * 200m)
v = 345 m/s^2

is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi chaotiiic! :smile:
chaotiiic said:
tanTheta = v^2/gR
tan10 = v^2/(9.8 * 200m)

formula looks ok

are you sure about the 345 ?

(and speed is m/s, not m/s2)
 
tiny-tim said:
hi chaotiiic! :smile:


formula looks ok

are you sure about the 345 ?

(and speed is m/s, not m/s2)

so is it 0.1763 = v^2/1960
v^2=345.6
v=18.59m/s
 
yes! :smile:

(are you ok now, or is there anything you're still not sure about?)​
 
tiny-tim said:
yes! :smile:

(are you ok now, or is there anything you're still not sure about?)​

thankyou.
im actually still confused about everything. the only reason i was able to answer this problem is because there's a problem identical in my book to the one i asked. my teacher gives out quizzes before lectures so hopefully ill understand when i go to class later today.
 
ok, so you don't understand the reason for the formula? …
chaotiiic said:
tanTheta = v^2/gR

like almost all dynamics questions, it all boils down to good ol' Newton's second law (F = ma) …

you know the acceleration (as a function of v),

and although you know the weight, you don't know the normal force …

so you do F = ma perpendicular to the unknown (normal) force :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top